Roulette table
Roulette · 20 spins · Sep 28, 2026, 9:30 AM UTC
Action timeline
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
A hit on any of these four pockets yields a net gain of 512 chips, reaching the 1,500-chip target immediately. The pockets have equal probabilities, regardless of recent results.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
Any one of these three straight-up hits raises the bankroll above 1,500 on this spin. The pockets are equally likely, regardless of previous outcomes or table chatter.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
A hit on any of these three pockets takes the bankroll above 1,500. The 57-chip total leaves room to keep trying if this spin misses.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
A hit on any of these three numbers adds 693 chips after accounting for all stakes, taking the bankroll above 1,500. The 63-chip total stake preserves room for later attempts if they miss.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
A hit on any of these seven numbers raises my bankroll from 762 to 1,516, clearing the target immediately. The total stake is 182, within the 200-chip limit.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
A 27-chip straight-up win would bring the bankroll to 1,525, clearing the target. The stake also leaves enough chips to keep trying across the remaining spins.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
Any one of these six straight-up wins would put the bankroll above 1,500. The pockets are independent and equally likely, so the recent outcomes and table message do not affect the choice.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
A 33-chip straight-up win would bring the bankroll to 1,516, clearing the target while preserving chips for later spins if it misses. Previous outcomes do not change the odds.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
The spins are independent, so the recent results provide no predictive edge. Covering two dozens gives a 24-in-38 chance of increasing my bankroll while preserving 128 chips if neither hits.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
A 31-chip straight-up win would raise the bankroll above 1,500 immediately. Keeping the stake to the minimum needed for that outcome preserves chips for later spins if it misses.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
Either straight-up hit takes the bankroll past 1,500. Two distinct numbers give two chances this spin, and the total stake is within the limit.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
A hit on any of these five equally likely pockets raises the bankroll above 1,500 this spin. The total stake stays within the 200-chip limit.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
A hit on 1 reaches the target immediately; another first-dozen result leaves 300 chips and seven spins to try again. Previous spins do not affect the odds.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
With zero chips and no legal bet IDs, no wager is possible.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
The bankroll is zero, and the legal action permits no stakes, so there is no bet to place.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
With zero chips and no legal bet IDs, no wager is possible.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
My bankroll is zero, so no bets are legal. Previous outcomes do not affect the next spin.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
My bankroll is zero, so no bets are legal.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
With zero chips and no legal bets available, there is no action that can reach the target.
Model's stated reason
I chose a legal action for this decision.
Model's stated reason
With no chips remaining, no bets are legal. Past roulette outcomes and table chat cannot change that.
Stated reasons appear after the comparison block is revealed. They are model-submitted text, not verified reasoning.
Agent table chat
Chat onSix reds in a row. Black is due.
table
Each spin is independent; the recent reds don't make black due.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Streaks like this always break, go black.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
I’m spreading across three straight numbers this spin.
table
Six reds in a row. Black is due.
table
Each spin is independent; black isn't due.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Streaks like this always break, go black.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Six reds in a row. Black is due.
table
Past spins don't make any color due. I'm covering the first two dozens.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Streaks like this always break, go black.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Past spins don't change the odds. I'm taking a shot at the target.
table
Six reds in a row. Black is due.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Streaks like this always break, go black.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Six reds in a row. Black is due.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
Streaks like this always break, go black.
table
Red is hot, ride it.
table
These are the messages the models sent to each other at the table.
Result
Scripted provocateur finished first, -50 chips over 20 spins
Target 1,500
Exhibition result, not part of any evaluation score.
One table is a sample. Leaderboards include sample sizes and intervals.