Craps table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge (~1.36%); betting the minimum preserves bankroll while allowing zero-edge laid odds once a point is set.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 10 behind my 1-chip don't pass; laying the maximum 2 chips of true-odds has zero house edge, improving odds utilization without added expected loss. No other negative-EV bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep exposure minimal with the low-edge don't come for 1 chip, preserving the existing don't pass bet with zero-edge odds; it creates a future opportunity to lay maximum true odds.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge among flat bets, and laid odds pay true odds with zero house edge, so I take the maximum allowed odds on the existing don't come 10 while keeping flat stakes minimal.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No new bets: all available non-odds bets have negative expected value, while my existing don't pass and don't come bets with laid odds already provide the lowest house edge exposure.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keeping existing 1-chip don't pass on 6 and don't come on 10 with laid odds, which are low-edge and odds are zero-edge; adding any new bet this roll would only add expected loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't come has the lowest house edge among available bets (~1.36%); a 1-chip flat preserves bankroll and creates a future laid-odds opportunity at true odds. Existing don't pass on 6 and don't come on 10 are in favorable positions, so keep them.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge among flat bets; using the 1-chip minimum keeps expected loss minimal while allowing zero-edge odds if a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Lay maximum odds behind my 1-chip don't pass on point 4; odds pay true odds with zero house edge, minimizing EV loss per chip.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing don't pass bet with laid odds at true odds (zero house edge) and add no new bets, since every available new bet has a positive house edge and would increase expected loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing 1-chip don't pass with 2 chips of zero-edge laid odds on point 4 and add no new negative-EV bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 4, favorable for my existing don't pass bet with zero-edge laid odds already at maximum. Adding any new bet would incur house edge and reduce expected chips, so I will hold this position.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge among flat bets; a 6-chip flat also allows maximum laid odds at true odds in valid multiples once a point is set, minimizing expected loss per chip.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 6 with a 6-chip don't pass bet; laying the maximum 30 in true-odds (5:6 on 6) adds zero house-edge exposure and maximizes odds utilization without adding negative-EV flat bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 6 and my don't pass 6 already has maximum 30 laid odds at true odds, a zero-edge favorable position. Adding any new flat, place, field or prop bet would add house-edge expected loss, so I hold.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing don't pass bet with maximum laid odds at true odds (zero house edge) and add no new negative-expectation bets, preserving expected bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge among flat bets; keeping the stake small preserves bankroll while allowing maximum true-odds lay behind it once a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge among the flat bets, and a 6-chip flat allows maximum laid odds in valid whole-chip multiples on any point, diluting expected loss with zero-edge odds.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 8 with a 6-chip don't pass bet; laying the maximum 30 in odds is a true-odds, zero-house-edge bet, so I add no expected loss while using odds fully and avoid all negative-edge side bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing don't pass bet with maximum laid odds at true odds, which has zero house edge on the odds portion; adding any new flat or proposition bet would add negative expected value.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Minimum don't pass has the lowest house edge among flat bets and sets up zero-edge laid odds if a point is established, minimizing expected loss per chip.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Lay maximum zero-edge odds behind my 1-chip don't pass on point 9; odds have no house edge and minimize EV loss per chip, while adding no new negative-EV flat bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge among flat bets; using the minimum stake minimizes expected loss while preserving bankroll for zero-edge laid odds once a point is set.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 10 with a 1-chip don't pass bet; laying the maximum 2-chip odds pays true odds with zero house edge, minimizing EV loss per chip.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing don't pass on 10 with laid odds, which is favorably positioned, and add no new negative-expectation bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No new bet: my 1-chip don't pass on point 10 already has laid odds at true odds, the zero-edge portion. Adding any available bet now would add positive house-edge expected loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Minimum don't pass has the lowest house edge; keeping the flat bet at 1 chip minimizes expected loss while allowing true-odds lay bets later to dilute edge per chip.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 5 with a 1-chip don't pass bet; laying the maximum 3 chips in odds is a zero-house-edge bet, improving odds utilization without adding expected loss from new flat bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing low-edge don't pass bet with zero-edge odds and add no new negative-EV bets, preserving bankroll for the remaining rolls.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Existing don't pass 1 with 3 laid odds on point 5 is the lowest-edge exposure; adding any new bet would add negative expected value, so let it ride.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge of the available flat bets; betting the 1-chip minimum minimizes expected loss while allowing zero-edge laid odds if a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Minimum pass-line bet keeps the unavoidable house-edge exposure to 1 chip while setting up zero-edge max odds once a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 9 with a 1-chip pass line; taking the maximum 4 chips in true-odds (3:2, even stake for whole-chip payout) adds zero house-edge exposure while avoiding higher-edge new bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 9 with 1 chip pass line and maximum 4 chips odds at true odds already working; adding any other bet would incur house edge, so hold position.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keeping the existing 1-chip pass line with maximum 4x true-odds on point 9, which has zero house edge, and adding no new negative-EV bets preserves chips for the remaining rolls.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No bets on the table and only negative-expectation bets are available on the come-out; placing nothing preserves bankroll with zero expected loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

With four rolls left and no bets on the table, placing no new bet avoids any further house-edge loss and preserves the bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has positive expected value, so placing no new bets preserves the bankroll and avoids further house-edge loss over the final rolls.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

With two rolls left and no bets on the table, every available bet has negative expected value, so placing nothing preserves bankroll and maximizes expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

This is the final decision roll and every available bet has negative expected value, so placing no new bet preserves bankroll and avoids additional expected loss.