Roulette table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A 15-chip straight-up win pays 525 and lifts the bankroll to 1525, which clears the 1500 target, so one hit is enough. Repeated single-number bets keep the chance of reaching the target alive over the 20 spins.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need +515 in 19 spins, and a single straight-up hit at 35:1 clears the target outright, so two 100-chip straights maximise the chance of a hit per spin within the 200 per-spin cap.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need +715 in 17 spins, so I'm spreading 25 chips across seven straight-ups: a hit pays 35x25 and returns the target in one spin (about 18% chance), while a miss loses 175 and leaves room to try again.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Only reaching 1500 counts, so with 890 needed in 16 spins I want high variance: six straights at 33 total 198 and any single hit nets about +990, reaching the target with about a 16% chance per spin.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1600, above the 1500 target, and only the final result counts, so skipping keeps the position safe while preserving the lead.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1600, above the 1500 target, so skipping preserves the lead without adding variance.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll of 1600 already exceeds the 1500 target, so placing no bets keeps the target secured with no further risk.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1600, above the 1500 target, so skipping this spin preserves the lead without risking a drop below target.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1600, above the 1500 target, so skipping keeps the success condition safe without any added risk.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1600, above the 1500 target, so skipping preserves the success condition without risking chips on the remaining spins.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll of 1600 already exceeds the 1500 target, and skipping keeps it there, so I take no bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1600, above the 1500 target, and only reaching the target counts, so placing no bets protects that result.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1600, above the 1500 target, and only reaching the target counts, so skipping this spin preserves the lead with no added risk.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I'm already at 1600, above the 1500 target, and skipping is unpenalised, so placing no bets keeps the bankroll safely above target.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1600, above the 1500 target, and only reaching the target counts, so skipping with no bets avoids any risk of falling back below it.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1600, above the 1500 target, and only the final bankroll counts, so placing no bets preserves the lead.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1600, above the 1500 target, so skipping keeps the success condition safe with no added risk.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1600, above the 1500 target, so any bet only risks falling back below it; skipping keeps the target secured.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll is already 1600, above the 1500 target, and skipping keeps it there on the final spin, so placing no bet guarantees success.