Roulette table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Three straight-ups at 16 chips each. A hit pays 35:1 on that number, a net gain of 528, which clears the 1,500 target in one spin. Each spin costs only 48, so the bankroll can afford many tries over the 20 spins.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Only reaching 1500 counts, so I'm playing bold. One straight-up bet sized at 16 makes a single hit return 35x16 = 560, enough to reach 1512, while keeping the stake small enough to retry over many spins.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Only reaching 1,500 counts, so I'm making bold, high-variance bets. Four straight-up bets of 20 each would each net 640 on a hit, which clears the 564-chip gap in one win while keeping enough bankroll for many more attempts.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need +644 to reach 1500. Two 20-chip straight-up bets would net +680 if either hits, and that stake can be sustained across the remaining spins, giving a high chance of reaching the target.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Two straight-up bets of 21 chips each mean a single hit puts me past 1500. The stake is sized so the bankroll lasts many spins and gets the most chances to reach the target.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I'm 726 short of the target with 15 spins left, so I'm placing straight-up bets sized so that one hit reaches 1,500 (774 - 44 + 792 = 1,522). Two 22-chip bets per spin keeps the bankroll stretched across the remaining spins.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need +770 in 14 spins under a 200 per-spin cap, so I'm using a high-variance spread. Three straight-ups at 24 each would net +792 on a hit (reaching about 1522), while keeping the per-spin cost low enough to allow roughly 10 attempts.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Only reaching 1500 counts, so I am betting 25 each on two straight-up numbers. Either hit lifts the bankroll to 1508, and this sizing should let me keep trying across most of the remaining 13 spins.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A single hit on either number takes the bankroll to 1526, past the 1500 target. Small straight-up stakes stretch the bankroll over the remaining spins, which gives a better chance of reaching the target than even-money bets do.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I bet 28 on each of two straight-ups, the smallest stakes where one hit reaches the 1,500 target (1,506). Spreading the bankroll over the remaining spins this way gives about a 31% chance of reaching the target.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need +1002 chips in 10 spins. Two straight-up bets of 30 each would reach 1518 if either hits, and the small stakes leave budget for as many more covered numbers as possible over the remaining spins.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need +1062 to reach the target, so I'm putting the minimal stake on two straight-ups that clears 1500 if either one hits. That keeps enough bankroll for repeated shots over the remaining spins.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need +1126 from 374 with 8 spins left. Five straight-up bets of 37 cost 185, and any single hit returns enough (37*35 - 4*37 = 1147 net) to reach 1500, which maximises the per-spin hit chance while keeping enough chips for further attempts.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need 1,311 more chips with 7 spins left, so I am betting 41 on each of four single numbers. Any hit takes me to about 1,501, which gives roughly a 10.5% chance and is about the best this bankroll allows.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

With 25 chips and 6 spins left, reaching 1500 needs very high multiples, so a full-stack straight-up bet gives the best chance. A hit takes the bankroll to 900, which keeps the target reachable.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll is 0 and there are no legal bet IDs or stake allowance, so the only valid action is to place no bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is 0 and there are no legal bet IDs or stake capacity, so the only valid action is to place no bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll is 0 and there are no legal bet IDs (max total stake 0), so the only legal action is to place no bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is 0, so no legal bets are available (max total stake 0); skipping is the only legal action.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is 0 and there are no legal bet IDs, with a max total stake of 0, so the only valid action is to place no bets.