Craps table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge among the available come-out bets. I'll start with the minimum flat bet and add laid odds later if a point is established to improve odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add maximum laid odds behind my don't pass 9; odds carry zero house edge and improve odds utilization. No negative-EV bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No positive-EV bets are available. The existing dont_pass and laid odds on 9 are in a favorable state; adding any new flat bet would incur a house edge and reduce expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add a don't come bet with a moderate stake to enable large free odds later, minimizing house edge and maximizing odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add maximum free odds behind the existing don't come 8 to reduce the average house edge without adding new negative-EV flat bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Existing dont_pass and dont_come bets are favorably positioned with point 9 and 8; no new bets offer positive expected value and odds cannot be added.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No new bets: all available wagers are -EV, while my existing dont_pass and dont_come bets have positive expectation from their established points. Keeping odds in action.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add a dont_come flat bet to establish a new point and later back it with odds, maximizing odds utilization while keeping house edge low.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No positive EV bets are available; existing don't bets already have positive expectation and odds, so I avoid adding negative EV flat bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting don't pass to minimize house edge and leave room for maximum free odds once a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add maximum laid odds behind my don't pass point of 6; odds carry zero house edge and improve odds utilization without increasing expected loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting the don't pass line to minimize house edge and preserve room for max odds once a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Adding maximum laid odds behind my don't pass 9 to boost odds utilization with zero house edge, while keeping the flat bet that anchors the odds.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No new bets. Existing don't pass and laid odds on point 9 are already in a favorable position; adding any further negative-EV bets would reduce expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Current don't pass flat on point 9 has positive expected value (~+0.2 per unit) and the laid odds are fairly priced. No additional odds can be placed this roll (max_odds_stake=0), and every new bet available has a negative house edge. Doing nothing preserves the positive EV position and avoids diluting chip EV.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Placing a don't pass bet (lowest house edge) with a stake of 50 to allow maximum odds later without exceeding the 300-chip exposure limit, optimizing ev_loss_per_chip and odds_utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add maximum laid odds behind the existing don't pass bet on point 8. The flat bet has positive conditional EV after the point is set, and the odds are zero house edge, improving odds utilization without adding negative EV.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting don't pass with minimum stake to establish a flat bet for odds, minimizing house edge and enabling max odds later.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add the maximum zero-house-edge laid odds behind my existing don't pass 9 to improve odds utilization without taking on negative-EV bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No positive EV bets are available; the existing dont_pass on 9 is favorable and already backed by odds. Adding any new flat bet would increase expected loss and dilute odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

The existing don't pass and laid odds on 9 are favorable/zero-EV; every available new bet has a negative house edge, so I add nothing and keep the current position.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bet the minimum on Don't Pass to minimize house edge and preserve room to take maximum free odds once a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge among available bets (1.36% due to bar 12). I'll establish a flat bet now to enable zero-house-edge odds on the next roll if a point is set.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Pass line keeps the house edge low, and a 1-chip flat allows full free odds on every point (5x on 6/8, 4x on 5/9, 3x on 4/10), which maximizes odds utilization while minimizing expected loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting the don't pass line with minimum stake to minimize expected loss while allowing maximum odds utilization when a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 5; my existing don't pass has positive conditional expectation, so I keep it and add the maximum $3 laid odds, which are zero house edge.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing don't pass and laid odds on point 5; no new bets because every available bet has a negative house edge and the odds bet is already at its legal multiple.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Existing don't pass with odds on 5 is +EV; no additional bets offer positive expectation, so stand pat.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No new bets; existing don't pass and laid odds on 5 are favorable/fair. All available new bets carry a house edge, so pass.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have negative expected value; no bet maximizes expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting don't come to minimize house edge and set up for maximum odds utilization next roll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add maximum laid odds behind the existing don't come 4; odds carry zero house edge and improve odds utilization without adding negative-EV exposure.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting the don't pass line with the minimum stake that allows full odds on any point, to minimize house edge and maximize odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Adding maximum laid odds behind my don't pass point of 6 is a zero-house-edge bet that improves odds utilization without increasing expected loss. Other available bets carry negative EV, so I avoid them.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing don't pass and laid odds on 6; the flat bet has positive conditional expectation and the odds are already at the maximum. Every new bet available carries a house edge, so making no new bets maximizes expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Existing don't pass and laid odds on 6 are already positioned; all new bets carry a house edge, so no additional wagers.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Existing dont_pass and odds on point 6 have positive expected value and maximum odds. All available new bets carry a house edge, so adding them would reduce expected chips and worsen ev_loss_per_chip. Holding is optimal.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 6; the existing don't pass has positive conditional EV and the laid odds are already maxed at zero EV. No other available bet offers positive expectation, so I add nothing.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting the minimum flat that allows maximum odds utilization on the next roll; don't pass has the lowest house edge (1.36%).

I chose a legal action for this decision.

With one decision roll left and no point established, every available bet carries a negative house edge. The chip-maximizing action is to place no new bets and preserve bankroll.