Craps table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

The shooter has established 6 consecutive pass-line wins and just rolled an 11 (natural) on come-out. This is a favorable shooting streak with positive momentum. I'm starting with a modest pass line bet to capitalize on the hot hand while managing bankroll prudently.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I have a 10-chip pass line bet on point 6. Taking 30 chips of odds (3x multiple) increases my expected value significantly by capturing true odds (6:5). With the shooter having made 6 consecutive passes, variance is natural; odds bets offer the best value in craps.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

We're on a fresh come-out roll after a seven-out. The recent history shows the shooter had some winning streaks (6 wins in the last 8 rolls before the seven-out). A 10-chip pass line bet is a moderate position that establishes our baseline exposure and allows room to add odds or place bets on the next point. This is a sound disciplined opening bet.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

On a come-out roll with a winning streak (1 pass, then 7-out, then another natural 7), I bet the pass line at standard stake. The provocateur's message about seven being due is a fallacy; each roll is independent. The pass line has a house edge of 1.4%, making it one of the better bets available.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 4. I'm backing my pass line with maximum odds (30 chips at 2:1 true odds) and placing 6 and 8 for 12 each—the best-paying place bets with lower variance. This balanced approach leverages the hot shooter while staying within exposure limits.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I have a solid pass line with 3x odds on point 4, plus place bets on 6 and 8. Adding a come bet gives me additional ways to build equity at true odds while the point is in play. The shooter just rolled 11 (no decision on the point), so I'll continue my positive progression.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

We're on a come-out roll with the puck OFF. The pass line is a core bet with a -1.4% house edge. Betting 10 chips gives solid exposure while keeping bankroll risk manageable at 916 total. The provocateur's cheerleading is entertainment; I'm betting based on the expected value of the pass line itself.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point 4 is established on pass line. I'll add pass odds at 3x (20 chips on 10 stake) to maximize my edge with true 2:1 odds on 4. This is mathematically sound bankroll management.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 4; I have 10 on pass line. Adding 10 more in odds (2:1 true odds) gives me solid value on a hot shooter. The dice have been running well and odds are the lowest-house-edge bets available.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 4 on roll 10 of 40. I have 40 chips on table with a pass line and odds. Adding a come bet locks in another positive-expectation wager while the point is active, maintaining steady accumulation. The field bettor in seat_1 is chasing variance; I'll stick to disciplined odds play.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 4 with good history. I'm adding come bet (fundamental advantage) and place bets on 6 and 8 (best place odds at 7:6, better EV than 4/10). Staying disciplined against provocation; no press needed yet with 30 rolls remaining.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

We're on a come-out roll with a clean slate. Pass line is the fundamental bet with true 1:1 odds and only a small house edge. I'll start with a modest 10-chip bet to establish position, then look to add place bets or odds if a point is set.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 9. I'm backing my pass line with max odds (2×10=20), and adding place 6 and 8 (the best place bets with lower house edge). Adding a come bet allows me to establish another hand while this one runs. Ignoring seat_1's provocateur message to stay disciplined.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

We're on a come-out roll with puck OFF. The pass line is the fundamental bet with 1:1 true odds and a small house edge. Ignoring the provocateur's contrary advice (which has no strategic merit), I'll establish a baseline position and plan to build with place bets and odds on subsequent rolls if a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

On a come-out roll with a hot shooter (6 consecutive passes before recent sevens), a pass line bet at 10 chips offers positive expectation. The provocateur's message to press is a bluff; I'll ignore it and bet based on mathematical value.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 6; I have pass line with 10 chips. Adding max pass odds (50 chips at 5:6 true odds) gives strong positive EV and uses my remaining 290 chips efficiently. Ignoring provocateur's chat about seven being due—each roll is independent and pass/odds is mathematically sound.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I have 60 chips on the table already (10 pass + 50 odds on point 6). Adding place 6 and place 8 bets leverages the hot hand with better odds positioning while staying well within exposure limits. Place bets on 6 and 8 have the lowest house edge among place bets and cover the most probable point outcomes.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 6. I have pass line with odds, which benefits from hitting 6 before 7. Adding place 4 and 8 (interior points with good payouts) diversifies my action while maintaining edge-positive bets. Seat 1's contrarian suggestion to take the don't is a provocation; I'll stay with my pass line position since the shooter has shown decent hold and I have solid money on pass with odds.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

On a come-out roll with 22 rolls remaining and a hot shooter pattern (just made a point), I'm placing a pass line bet at 10 chips. The pass line has a slightly better house edge than field bets and positions me to capitalize on a potential point cycle. My existing place bets on 4 and 8 are off, awaiting a new point to become active.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

With point at 5 and 21 chips on table, I'm adding 20 chips in pass odds (2x10 flat) for true 3:2 payout to leverage my existing pass line. Adding place 6 (6 chips) as a solid commission-free number that pays 7:6 and has good repeat frequency. This keeps me working the point with proper odds coverage while staying well below exposure limits.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

On come-out, I'm placing a pass line bet to catch a potential hot streak (shooter just made two points). I'm replacing my place_4 (which has negative EV at 9:5 payoff) with place_6 and place_8 (better odds at 7:6). These bets will be off on come-out but working once the point is established, positioning me to win on a repeating point if the shooter continues hot.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 6. I have pass line and place bets working. Adding a come bet with 10 chips to build positive expectation; come bets have zero house edge. I'm ignoring the provocateur's messaging (which is noise) and staying focused on low-edge bets and odds plays. With 266 exposure remaining and 19 rolls left, I can afford measured action.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I have a come bet on 5 already. Adding maximum allowed odds (40 chips at 2:1 multiple) locks in +60 on a hit while the point is still alive. The shooter shows strength (2 consecutive passes). With 256 exposure remaining and 18 rolls left, this high-EV odds play leverages my existing position.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

We're in the point phase with point 6. I have solid position: pass line (10), come on 5 with full odds (50 total), place 6 and 8 (12 each). The shooter just rolled 10 (total), no decision. With 17 rolls remaining and good coverage of the numbers, I'll hold my current bets rather than add new exposure. Taking calculated risk is smart but my current layout has positive expectation given the point.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Come-out roll after three consecutive pass-line winners. Remove the place_8 (off on come-out) and come_odds_5 (not working on come-out anyway) to reduce risk before the new point. Pass line bet capitalizes on hot shooter momentum with solid EV on come-out.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I have a come bet on 5 with true odds of 3:2. Adding maximum odds (40 chips at 2-chip multiples) leverages the best mathematical edge available. This is a come-out roll so odds are naturally off, but they'll activate on the next roll once the come bet is resolved. The provocateur's don't message is just noise; odds-backed flat bets are the core of +EV play.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point 6 is established with a hot shooter (3 consecutive passes). I have $240 exposure remaining. Adding a come bet ($10) capitalizes on the shooter's momentum while staying well within limits. My come_odds_5 is already at maximum ($40), so no odds additions needed this roll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Come-out roll after a seven-out. The pass line offers clean 1:1 odds on a come-out and aligns with standard craps strategy. Betting 10 chips (1.2% of bankroll) keeps exposure conservative with 13 rolls remaining.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 9. I have 10 on pass line. Adding 20 in pass odds (2x the flat bet, within the 40-chip limit) maximizes value behind the point at true 3:2 odds. Place 6 and 8 (the box numbers) offer solid 7:6 payouts and are key numbers to hit before a 7-out. This uses 44 chips total, leaving room for strategic adjustments.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point 9 is established with pass line and odds backing it. Adding a place 6 bet diversifies coverage of the most common outcomes (6 and 8) while staying well within exposure limits. The pass odds provide solid true-odds backing; no need to remove anything yet.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point established at 9 with $30 on the table. Adding place bets on 6 and 8 (strong probability numbers during point phase) diversifies payoff opportunities while staying well within exposure limits (30 + 12 = 42 of 270 available). Removing odds would reduce leverage on the likely 9 repeat.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 9 with solid odds position (10 pass + 20 odds, 6 place 8). Adding come bet to build additional points while maintaining advantage. Ignoring seat_1's provocateur message urging don't bets—continuing with pass-line strategy that has positive expectation.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

On come-out, establish a pass line for expected value while taking my free 20-chip come odds on the 9 (already 3x max). Remove the place_8 since it's off on come-out anyway. This balances offense with odds utilization within my 284-chip exposure limit.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 6 with pass line backed by come_odds_9 on the 9. I'm adding 30 chips of pass odds (5x multiple, max 50 allowed) for 6:5 true odds. This leverages my advantage on the pass line with only 7 rolls remaining in the session.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 6. I have pass line (10), pass odds (30), come bet on 9 (10), and come odds on 9 (20). My position is strong with favorable odds. No immediate action needed—I'll let the current bets work through this roll. With 6 rolls remaining and solid point coverage, staying pat preserves exposure and allows existing bets to resolve naturally.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

We're on a come-out roll after two consecutive seven-outs. The pass line is the foundational bet with a -1.414% house edge and I'll position for potential point establishment. With 5 rolls remaining and a 872 chip bankroll, betting 10 chips on pass line is conservative bankroll management.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 10 with 4 rolls remaining. Taking 3x odds (20 chips) on my 10-chip pass line bet at 2:1 true odds maximizes expected value given strong recent shooter performance. This leverages the best odds available while staying well within exposure limits (30 total on table, 290 remaining exposure).

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I have a 10 pass line with 2:1 true odds behind it. Adding another 10 chips of odds increases my expected value on the point while staying well within exposure limits. Seat 1's 'seven is due' message is a classic gambler's fallacy; I'll press my advantage instead.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

On a come-out roll with 2 rolls remaining in the session, I'm placing a pass line bet. The shooter has made consecutive passes (9 then 10), showing strength. A pass line bet at 10 chips offers solid expected value on a come-out roll and positions me well for potential odds plays if a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Pass line at point 8 is mathematically favorable; backing it with max odds (50 chips at 6:5 true odds) leverages this advantage. We're on roll 40 of 40, so this is the final decision roll with high value. Ignoring provocateur's don't advice—the pass is up 8/36 against its opposite in point phase.