Craps table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have a negative expected value on this come-out roll, so placing no wager maximizes expected bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets carry a negative house edge and no odds can be placed without a flat bet, so not wagering this roll maximizes expected bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't come has the lowest house edge among available point-phase bets; a 60-chip flat bet allows near-maximum lay odds within the 300-chip exposure cap.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have negative expected value, so placing no bet maximizes expected bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has positive expected value; all craps bets carry a house edge, so the best expected-chip action is to make no bet.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has a positive expectation; with no flat bet to support odds, the best EV decision is to make no new wagers.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets carry a negative house edge and there is no flat bet to attach zero-edge odds to, so the best expected-value action is to make no new bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No craps bet offers positive expected value; with no flat bet to support free odds, the best expected-value action is to make no bet and preserve chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets carry a house edge and there is no flat bet to attach zero-EV odds, so the best expected-value action is to make no new bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has a positive expected value; pass and don't pass both carry a house edge on the come-out, and the one-roll and place bets are worse. I stay out to preserve bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has positive expected value on this come-out roll; pass and don't pass both carry a house edge, and odds are not available until a point is set. Staying off the table preserves chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets carry a negative house edge, and with no flat bet to attach zero-edge odds to, the best expected-value action is to make no new wager this roll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets carry a house edge and no odds are available without a flat bet, so the highest expected-value action is to make no new bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have a negative expected value, so the best way to preserve and maximize expected bankroll is to make no new wager this roll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No craps bet has positive expected value; on a come-out roll even pass/don't pass carry a house edge, so staying off the table maximizes expected bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available craps wagers have negative expected value, so the best expected-chip decision is to make no bet and preserve bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge among available come-out bets and can be backed with zero-edge lay odds if a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Pass line has a low house edge (1.41%) and allows taking full odds later to reduce overall expected loss per chip, aligning with the evaluation metrics.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All currently available bets carry a negative expected value, and there is no fair odds bet available without first placing a negative-EV flat bet; standing aside preserves bankroll and maximizes expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have a negative expected value and we have no existing flat bet to take odds behind, so the expected-chip-maximizing action is to make no wager this roll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 9 with no flat bet to back with odds, and every available bet has a negative house edge, so the best expected-value play is to stay out this roll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have negative expected value and I have no flat bet to take odds behind, so the best expected-bankroll action is to make no bet.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have a negative expected value, so I decline to wager and preserve my bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have negative expected value, so the best way to maximize chips is to avoid wagering this roll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Taking a 6-unit Don't Come as a low-house-edge flat bet; if it travels, I plan to lay full odds to improve odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Adding maximum odds to the don't come 5 reduces the house edge to nearly zero on that bet, improving expected value.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I'm betting max on don't pass to get a low house edge and then add max lay odds behind it on the next roll, keeping my existing don't come 5 with full odds working.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

The don't pass point-6 flat has positive edge after the come-out; adding max free odds uses the fair odds allowed without adding negative EV bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keeping don't come 5 with max odds for low house edge; adding a don't pass bet now to set up another low-edge odds opportunity on the new point.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Laying maximum free odds behind the existing don't pass bet on point 6 reduces average house edge and improves odds utilization without adding any negative-expectation bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keeping don't bets with positive expected value; no new bets have positive EV. Removing odds would lock in fair value but reduce variance, which might be beneficial with limited rolls left, but max_odds_stake showing 0 suggests odds are already maxed. Adding any other bet would be -EV.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting the minimum on pass line to minimize expected loss while preserving the option to take full odds if a point is established, achieving optimal odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Maximize zero-house-edge odds behind the pass line on point 8; pass odds pay 6:5 true odds and improve expected value without adding house-edge bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No offered bet has positive expected value; the pass-line odds are zero EV and already working, so I make no new wagers and keep the existing odds.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the pass-line odds (true odds, no house edge) and avoid placing additional bets that carry a negative expected value.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have negative expected value; keeping the zero-EV pass odds maximizes odds utilization without adding -EV exposure.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My pass-line with full 5x odds on 8 is already the best EV position; all newly available bets have negative house edge, so I skip adding any.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available new bets have a negative house edge and my pass odds are already at the 5x maximum for the point 8, so no new bets or removals improve expected value.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the max free odds on the pass line point 8 because they have zero house edge and no additional negative-EV bets are warranted with only two rolls left.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No bet on the final come-out roll because all available craps wagers have a negative expected value and there is no existing flat bet to take free odds behind.