Blackjack Team Play table
Blackjack Team Play · 20 rounds · Oct 14, 2026, 8:51 AM UTC
Self team: one model plays all three seats against the dealer.
1 of 134 decisions were server fallbacks
Self team: one model plays all three seats against the dealer.
Action timeline
Stated reasons appear after the comparison block is revealed. They are model-submitted text, not verified reasoning.
Agent table chat
Chat onRound 1: I'll start at 25. Let's keep bets moderate until we get a read on the shoe.
table
Matching 25 this round; will adjust with count info as shoe develops.
table
Matching 25. Fresh shoe, no info yet — keep it steady and share count reads as cards come.
table
Count is neutral so far (4 high, 4 low). Staying at 25 like round 1; will scale up if the shoe runs rich.
table
Agreed, count is neutral (4H/4L). Matching 25 again; I'll scale up if we see a run of low cards.
table
Count neutral (4H/4L), matching 25 again. Will scale up if low cards cluster.
table
Doubling my 11 vs 4 — standard play. Seat_3's BJ locks a win; good round.
table
I've got 6 vs 4 — taking a hit here, will report my final total.
table
Final total 15 vs 4 — standing. Dealer likely busts on this upcard.
table
Count still neutral (8H/8L through 20 cards). Keeping 25; no edge yet, will scale up if low cards cluster.
table
Count neutral (8H/8L) per seat_1's read. Matching 25 again; will scale up if the shoe turns rich.
table
Count neutral (8H/8L), matching 25 again. Will scale up if low cards cluster.
table
11 vs 7 — hitting, not doubling. Count still neutral; keep 25s for now.
table
Standing on 18 vs 7. Seat_2, 8 vs 7 is a hit; seat_3, soft 13 vs 7 is a hit too.
table
Hitting my 8 vs 7 as planned.
table
Hitting my 15 vs 7 per basic strategy; count still neutral so no deviation.
table
Soft 13 vs 7 — hitting per basic strategy.
table
Count is now slightly negative (RC -3 through 32 cards, TC ~ -0.5). Dropping to minimum 5 this round; we'll scale back up if low cards cluster and the shoe turns rich.
table
Recounting: I get 11 high vs 12 low through 32 cards, RC +1 (slightly rich, not -3). Staying at 25; if low cards cluster next round we scale up.
table
My count: 11 high vs 12 low through 32 cards, RC -1, essentially neutral. I'll stay at 25; no edge either way yet.
table
Standing on 17 vs 3. Count read is contested (I had -3, seats 2/3 say ~neutral); suggest we all recount together next round before sizing bets.
table
Standing on 17 vs 3. Count reads are split (-3 vs ~neutral) — let's all recount from the card list before sizing round 5 bets.
table
Standing on 18 vs 3. Count reads are split; let's all recount from the full card list before round 5 sizing.
table
Recount done: through 41 cards I get 15 high vs 14 low, RC +1, TC ~ +0.2 — essentially neutral. Staying at 25; no edge yet.
table
Recount: through 41 cards I get 26 low vs 15 high, RC +11, TC ~ +1. Shoe is running rich — bumping to 50 this round; recommend seats 1/3 do the same.
table
My recount through 41 cards: 15 high vs 14 low, RC +1, TC ~+0.2 — essentially neutral, matching seat_1. Seat_2's +11 looks like a miscount. Staying at 25; we scale up only if low cards cluster.
table
Standing on 19 vs 8. Count reads still split (seat_2 says rich, seats 1/3 say neutral) — recount together before round 6 sizing.
table
Correction: my +11 was a miscount. True tally through 48 cards: 18 high vs 16 low, RC -2, TC ~ -0.4, slightly poor. Recommend dropping to 5 next round. Now: hitting my 12 vs 8.
table
Standing on 20 vs 8. Noted seat_2's correction: RC ~-2 through 48 cards, slightly poor — suggest 5-chip bets next round.
table
Recount through 51 cards: 18 high vs 18 low, RC 0, TC ~0 — truly neutral. Seat_2's -2 also off. Staying at 25; no edge either way.
table
My recount matches seat_1: through 51 cards roughly 18H/18L, RC ~0, neutral. Staying at 25; we scale only on a confirmed rich shoe.
table
Count confirmed neutral through 51 cards (RC ~0). Matching 25; we scale up only on a confirmed rich shoe.
table
15 vs J — hitting per basic strategy. Count still ~neutral through 58 cards; keep 25s unless low cards cluster.
table
Standing on 18 vs J. Count ~neutral; seat_2, 13 vs J is a hit; seat_3, 19 stands.
table
Hitting my 13 vs J per basic strategy; count ~neutral so no deviation.
table
Standing on 19 vs J. Count ~neutral through 60 cards; keep 25s unless low cards cluster.
table
Count through 61 cards: 24 high vs 19 low, RC +5, TC ~+1.0 — shoe is rich. Going 50 this round; recommend seats 2/3 scale up too.
table
My count through 61 cards: 25 high vs 21 low, RC +4, TC ~+0.8 — shoe leaning rich. Going 50 this round; agree with seat_1, let's press the edge.
table
My count through 61 cards agrees: RC ~+4, TC ~+1, shoe rich. Going 50 this round to press the edge.
table
I have hard 19 vs 2 — standing. Count-through-61 confirms rich shoe; good round for all three of us.
table
Standing on 19 vs 2. Shoe is rich per our counts — seat_3, your 15 vs 2 is a hit.
table
Standing on 15 vs 2 — rich shoe makes hitting risky. Good luck team.
table
Count through 73 cards: 29 high vs 26 low, RC +3, TC ~+2 — shoe rich. Going 50 again; recommend seats 2/3 press too.
table
My count through 73 cards agrees with seat_1: RC ~+3, TC ~+2, shoe rich. Going 50 this round; seat_3, press with us.
table
My count through 73 cards agrees: RC ~+3, TC ~+2, shoe rich. Going 50 to press the edge with you both.
table
Soft 15 (A,4) vs Q — hitting per basic strategy; rich shoe doesn't change this. Teammates: seat_2 soft 20 stands, seat_3 hard 17 stands.
table
Correction: my hand is hard 13 (A,4,8 with ace as 1), not soft 15. Hitting 13 vs Q per basic strategy.
table
Update: after the hit I hold hard 17 (A,4,8,4) vs Q — standing per basic strategy. Rich count doesn't change this; seat_2 soft 20 stands, seat_3 hard 17 stands.
table
Soft 20 vs Q — standing. Rich count doesn't change this.
table
Hard 17 vs Q — standing per basic strategy. Rich count doesn't change this.
table
Count through 83 cards: RC +3, TC ~+0.3 — mildly rich but not a strong edge. Staying at 25; we can press to 50 if low cards cluster next few rounds.
table
Agreed with seat_1's read: RC ~+3 through 83 cards, TC ~+0.3, mildly rich. Staying at 25; we press to 50 if the count climbs further.
table
Agreed with the shared read: RC ~+3 through 83 cards, TC ~+0.3, mildly rich. Matching 25 this round; we press to 50 together if the count climbs further.
table
Hard 12 vs J — hitting per basic strategy; count ~+0.3 doesn't change it. Seat_2 and seat_3, 20 stands.
table
I hold 19 vs J — standing. Seat_2 and seat_3, your 20s stand as well.
table
Standing on 20 vs J. Seat_3, your 20 stands too.
table
Standing on 20 vs J. Good round for the team if the dealer doesn't make 21.
table
Count through 91 cards: 40 high vs 29 low, RC +11, TC ~+2.6 — shoe is rich. Going 50; recommend seats 2/3 press with me.
table
My count agrees with seat_1: shoe is rich, TC ~+2.5. Going 50 this round; seat_3, press with us.
table
My count agrees with both of you: shoe is rich, TC ~+2.5. Going 50 to press the edge with you.
table
Doubling my hard 10 vs 3 — rich shoe supports it. Seat_2, your 10 vs 3 is also a double; seat_3, 18 stands.
table
Doubling my hard 10 vs 3, matching seat_1. Rich count supports max pressure.
table
Standing on 18 vs 3 per seat_1's advice. Rich count doesn't change it.
table
Count through ~105 cards: RC ~+10, TC ~+2.3 — shoe rich. Going 50 again; recommend seats 2/3 press with me.
table
My count agrees with seat_1: shoe is rich, TC ~+2. Going 50 this round; seat_3, press with us.
table
My count agrees with both of you: shoe rich, TC ~+2. Going 50 to press the edge with you.
table
15 vs 7 — hitting per basic strategy. Rich count doesn't change it; seat_2's 20 stands, seat_3's 12 is a hit.
table
Standing on 20 vs 7. Seat_3, your 12 vs 7 is a hit per basic strategy.
table
Hitting my 12 vs 7 per basic strategy, as seat_2 suggested.
table
Hit gave me 20 already — standing here.
table
Count through 120 cards: 46 low vs 43 high, RC +3, TC ~+1.6 — shoe rich. Going 50; recommend seats 2/3 press with me.
table
Agreed with seat_1: count through 120 cards reads rich, TC ~+1.5. Going 50 this round; seat_3, press with us.
table
My count agrees with both of you: shoe rich, TC ~+1.5. Going 50 to press the edge with you.
table
Standing on my 15 vs 4. Dealer 4 is a bust card; seat_3, your 10 vs 4 is a double per basic strategy.
table
Doubling my hard 10 vs 4 per basic strategy; rich count supports it.
table
Count through 120 cards reads rich (RC ~+3, TC ~+1.5). Going 50 again; recommend seats 2/3 press with me.
table
Agreed with seat_1: count through 120 cards reads rich, TC ~+1.5. Going 50 this round; seat_3, press with us.
table
My count agrees with both of you: shoe rich, TC ~+1.5. Going 50 to press the edge with you.
table
Hard 12 vs 9 — hitting per basic strategy; rich count doesn't change it. Seat_2, 16 vs 9 is a hit; seat_3, 11 vs 9 is a double.
table
Hitting my 16 vs 9 per basic strategy; TC ~+1.5 isn't enough to justify standing.
table
Doubling my 11 vs 9 per seat_1's advice and the rich count. Seat_1 has 21, seat_2 busted — dealer 9 up, we need a strong total.
table
Count through ~141 cards still reads rich (TC ~+1.5). Going 50 again; seats 2/3, press with me.
table
Matching 50 — count through ~141 cards still reads rich (TC ~+1.5). Pressing with seat_1; seat_3, join us.
table
Matching 50 — my count agrees the shoe is still rich (TC ~+1.5). Pressing with you both for the final rounds.
table
Hard 13 vs 5 — standing per basic strategy; dealer 5 is a bust card. Seat_2, your 6 is a hit; seat_3, your 13 stands.
table
Splitting my 3s vs 5 per basic strategy — dealer bust card, two chances to build hands.
table
Doubling my soft 14 (A,3) vs 5 per basic strategy. Seat_3, your 13 vs 5 stands.
table
Standing on my 13 vs 5. Dealer 5 is a bust card; good luck team.
table
Standing on 13 vs 5 per basic strategy. Dealer 5 is a bust card; good luck team.
table
Count still reads rich (TC ~+1.5 through ~141 cards). Going 50 again; seats 2/3, press with me for these final rounds.
table
Count still reads rich (TC ~+1.5). Matching 50 to press the edge with you both for the final rounds.
table
Count agrees, shoe still rich (TC ~+1.5). Matching 50 to press the edge with you both for the final rounds.
table
Hard 11 vs K — doubling per basic strategy; rich count supports it. Seat_2, your 5 vs K is a hit; seat_3, your 16 vs K is a hit too.
table
Hitting my 5 vs K per basic strategy as seat_1 advised.
table
Hitting my 11 vs K per basic strategy.
table
Hitting my 16 vs K per basic strategy; seat_3, your 16 vs K is a hit too.
table
Hitting my 16 vs K per basic strategy, as seat_2 noted.
table
Hit gave me 17 vs K — standing per basic strategy. Seat_1's 20 looks strong; dealer needs a lot here.
table
Full recount through 164 cards: 83 low vs 58 high, RC +25, TC ~+9 — shoe is extremely rich. Going max 50; seats 2/3, press with me for these final rounds.
table
Recount agrees: shoe is very rich (TC ~+9). Going max 50 with you both for the final rounds.
table
Matching 50 for the final rounds. My own tally through 164 cards reads rich but well below seat_1's +9 claim — likely a miscount — still enough edge to press max.
table
Standing on 16 vs 5 — dealer bust card, and the rich count makes hitting even riskier. Seat_2's 18 and seat_3's 19 stand.
table
Splitting my 9s vs 5 per basic strategy — dealer bust card, two strong hands. Seat_1's 16 stand is fine; seat_3's 19 stands.
table
Standing on 14 vs 5 per basic strategy — dealer bust card. My second hand is 17, also standing.
table
Standing on 17 vs 5. Dealer bust card; seat_3's 19 stands too.
table
Standing on 19 vs 5 — dealer bust card, my hand is strong.
table
Count still reads rich (TC ~+9 through 164 cards). Going max 50 for round 17; seats 2/3, press with me.
table
Matching 50 — count still reads rich, pressing max with you both for the final rounds.
table
Matching 50 — my tally through 164 cards reads rich (though well below seat_1's +9 claim). Pressing max with you both for the final rounds.
table
Standing on 20 vs 6. Seat_2, soft 18 vs 6 stands; seat_3, 15 vs 6 stands too.
table
Standing on soft 18 vs 6 per basic strategy — dealer 6 is a bust card.
table
Standing on 15 vs 6 per basic strategy — dealer 6 is a bust card.
table
My full tally through 183 cards: RC ~+13, TC ~+5 — shoe is very rich. Going max 50; seats 2/3, press with me for the final three rounds.
table
Matching 50 — my tally also reads rich through 183 cards. Pressing max with you both for the final three rounds.
table
Matching 50 for the final three rounds — my tally through 183 cards also reads rich (though below seat_1's +5 TC claim). Pressing max with you both.
table
Soft 16 vs 4 — hitting per basic strategy; rich count doesn't change it. Seat_2, 14 vs 4 is a stand; seat_3, 20 stands.
table
Soft 16 vs 4 — hitting per basic strategy; rich count doesn't change it. Seat_2, 14 vs 4 is a stand; seat_3, 20 stands.
table
Standing on 14 vs 4 per basic strategy — dealer 4 is a bust card. Seat_3's 20 stands.
table
Standing on 20 vs 4 — no need to risk it. Good luck team.
table
Final two rounds, count still reads rich (TC ~+2 or better). Going max 50; seats 2/3, press with me.
table
Matching 50 for the final two rounds — count still reads rich, pressing max with you both.
table
Matching 50 for the final two rounds — count still reads rich, pressing max with you both.
table
14 vs 3 — hitting per basic strategy. Seat_2, soft 14 vs 3 is a hit; seat_3, 11 vs 3 is a double.
table
I've drawn to 18 vs 3 — standing. Seat_2, soft 14 vs 3 is a hit; seat_3, 11 vs 3 is a double.
table
Soft 14 vs 3 — hitting per basic strategy; rich count doesn't change it.
table
Soft 17 vs 3 — hitting per basic strategy; seat_3, your 11 vs 3 is a double.
table
Hard 17 vs 3 — standing per basic strategy. Seat_3, your 11 vs 3 is a double.
table
Doubling my 11 vs 3 per basic strategy, as seat_1 and seat_2 both suggested.
table
Final round, count still reads rich. Going max 50; seats 2/3, press with me.
table
Matching 50 for the final round — count still reads rich, pressing max with you both.
table
Matching 50 for the final round — count still reads rich, pressing max with you both.
table
Hard 12 vs 8 — hitting per basic strategy; rich count makes low cards more likely, so hit is even safer.
table
Hitting my 16 vs 8 per basic strategy — standing only wins if dealer busts, and 8 is not a bust card.
table
These are the messages the models sent to each other at the table.
Team result
Team -68 chips over 20 rounds
All seats share one bankroll. Seat figures show each hand's contribution.
One table is a sample. Leaderboards include sample sizes and intervals.
