Blackjack Team Play table
Blackjack Team Play · 20 rounds · Oct 14, 2026, 8:51 AM UTC
Self team: one model plays all three seats against the dealer.
Self team: one model plays all three seats against the dealer.
Action timeline
Model's stated reason
With no cards seen, there is no evidence of a player-favorable shoe, so the minimum bet limits expected losses.
Model's stated reason
The count is only slightly positive in a six-deck shoe, so there is no meaningful edge to justify raising the bet.
Model's stated reason
The count is only slightly positive, so there is no meaningful betting edge to justify raising above the minimum.
Stated reasons appear after the comparison block is revealed. They are model-submitted text, not verified reasoning.
Agent table chat
Chat onNo count yet; use minimum bets until the shoe shows a favorable count. Share any count observations.
table
Agreed—minimum bet for now; I’ll track the count as cards are revealed.
table
Agreed; minimum bet until the count indicates a favorable shoe. I'll track revealed cards too.
table
Visible Hi-Lo running count is +2 across 8 cards; still effectively neutral for six decks.
table
Doubling 9 vs dealer 3; Hi-Lo running count is +2 after 8 exposed cards.
table
Standing on 17 vs. dealer 3; visible count is +3 across 9 cards.
table
Visible Hi-Lo count is +3 over 11 cards, still near neutral; recommend minimum bets for now.
table
Hi-Lo running count +3 over 11 cards (about +0.5 true count); still near neutral, so minimum bet.
table
Visible Hi-Lo count is +3 over 11 cards, about +0.5 true count; staying at the minimum bet.
table
Hard 8 versus dealer 3: hit; count remains close to neutral.
table
Hard 10 has already used three cards, so doubling is unavailable; hitting is the best play against dealer 3.
table
Standing on hard 13 vs dealer 3; visible Hi-Lo count is +7 over 20 cards.
table
Standing on hard 17 vs dealer 3. Visible Hi-Lo running count is +7 across 20 cards.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +6 after 22 exposed cards, about +1 true count with roughly 5.6 decks remaining; still near neutral, so minimum bet.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +7 across 22 exposed cards, about +1.2 true count; staying at the minimum until the count is more favorable.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +6 across 22 exposed cards, roughly +1 true count; minimum bet remains appropriate.
table
Hard 16 vs. dealer 10: hit; the visible Hi-Lo count is still too low to justify standing.
table
Standing on hard 17 vs. dealer 10; standard play is to stand.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +3 after 32 exposed cards, about +0.5 true count; still near neutral, so minimum bet.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +3 after 32 exposed cards (about +0.5 true count); staying at the minimum bet.
table
Visible Hi-Lo running count is +3 after 32 cards, about +0.5 true count with roughly 5.5 decks remaining; staying at the minimum bet.
table
Standing on 20 vs. dealer 8.
table
Hard 12 vs. dealer 8: hit; the dealer's strong upcard makes standing less favorable.
table
Standing on hard 18 vs. dealer 8.
table
Visible Hi-Lo count is +1 over 40 cards (about +0.2 true count); shoe is near neutral, so keep minimum bets.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +1 over 40 exposed cards (about +0.2 true count), so the shoe remains near neutral; minimum bet.
table
Hi-Lo count is +5 across 41 exposed cards, roughly +0.9 true count with about 5.3 decks remaining; still near neutral, so minimum bet.
table
Standing on 20 vs. dealer 9.
table
Soft 14 vs. dealer 9: hit; the visible Hi-Lo count is about +1 over 48 cards, near neutral.
table
Soft 18 vs. dealer 9: hit; basic strategy favors drawing against this strong upcard.
table
Hard 16 vs. dealer 9: hit; standing has poor expected value against this strong upcard.
table
Hard 8 vs. dealer 9: hit; the visible count remains near neutral.
table
Hard 10 vs. dealer 9: hit; doubling is unavailable after three cards.
table
Standing on hard 18 against dealer 9.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +6 after 54 exposed cards, about +1 true count with roughly 5 decks remaining; still near neutral, so minimum bet.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +6 after 54 cards, about +1.2 true count with roughly five decks remaining; stay at the minimum bet.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about +6 after 54 exposed cards, roughly +1.2 true count; shoe remains near neutral, so minimum bet.
table
Standing on hard 18 vs. dealer K.
table
Soft 14 vs. dealer K: hit; doubling is not favorable against this upcard.
table
Hard 13 vs. dealer K: hit; the visible count is only around +1 true count, below the threshold for standing.
table
Standing on hard 19 vs. dealer K.
table
Standing on hard 17 vs. dealer K.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +3 after 64 exposed cards, about +0.6 true count with roughly 4.9 decks remaining; staying at the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +3 after 64 cards, about +0.6 true count; the shoe is near neutral, so minimum bet.
table
Hi-Lo count is about +3 after 64 cards (~+0.6 true count); still near neutral, so minimum bet.
table
Standing on hard 13 vs. dealer 6; basic strategy favors standing.
table
Standing on hard 12 vs. dealer 6; basic strategy favors standing, and the shoe count appears slightly positive.
table
Standing on 20 vs. dealer 6.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +4 after 74 exposed cards, about +0.8 true count with roughly 4.8 decks remaining; shoe remains near neutral, so minimum bet.
table
Recounting all 74 exposed cards gives Hi-Lo running count +10, roughly +2 true count with about 4.8 decks left; favorable enough to raise bets.
table
Recounted Hi-Lo is +4 after 74 exposed cards (~+0.8 true count with about 4.8 decks remaining); keep bets at the minimum.
table
Recounted the 82 exposed cards: Hi-Lo running count is +3, about +0.5 true count. Shoe is near neutral; minimum bet.
table
Hi-Lo count is +3 over 82 exposed cards, roughly +0.6 true count with about 4.6 decks remaining; near neutral, so minimum bet.
table
I recounted all 82 visible cards: Hi-Lo running count +3, about +0.6 true count with roughly 4.6 decks remaining. Near neutral; minimum bet.
table
Standing on hard 17 vs. dealer 3.
table
Doubling hard 11 against dealer 3; this is the standard favorable play.
table
Doubling hard 10 against dealer 3; basic strategy favors doubling here.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about +3 over 93 exposed cards (roughly +0.7 true count); the shoe remains near neutral, so minimum bet.
table
Recounted all 93 exposed cards: Hi-Lo running count +3, about +0.7 true count with roughly 4.5 decks remaining. Near neutral; minimum bet.
table
Recounted the visible cards: Hi-Lo running count is about +3, still near neutral. Minimum bet remains appropriate.
table
Doubling hard 11 against dealer Q; this is the strong standard play.
table
Hard 16 vs. dealer Q: hit; the visible Hi-Lo count is approximately neutral.
table
Standing on hard 18 against dealer Q.
table
Visible Hi-Lo count remains modestly positive, around +4 running; with roughly 4.4 decks remaining, the true count is under +1. Keep minimum bets.
table
Recounted all 105 visible cards: Hi-Lo running count +6, about +1.4 true count with roughly 4.3 decks remaining. Still below a strong betting edge; minimum bet.
table
Visible Hi-Lo count is mildly positive but still below a meaningful betting edge; keep minimum bets.
table
Hard 7 vs dealer 9: hit.
table
Hard 9 vs dealer 9: hit; doubling is unavailable after the third card.
table
Standing on hard 19 against dealer 9.
table
Hard 9 vs. dealer 9: hit; doubling is not favorable against this upcard.
table
Standing on hard 19 against dealer 9.
table
Standing on hard 19 vs dealer 9.
table
I count 116 exposed cards at Hi-Lo +5 (about +1 true count with roughly 4.4 decks remaining); edge is not strong enough to raise, so minimum bet.
table
Visible Hi-Lo count is modestly positive, roughly +5 running over 116 cards (about +1.3 true count with around 3.8 decks left); keep bets at the minimum.
table
Recounted the 116 visible cards: Hi-Lo running count is +5, roughly +1.2 true count with about 4.2 decks remaining. Keep bets at the minimum.
table
Hard 12 vs Q: hit; the visible count does not justify standing.
table
Standing on hard 19 vs. Q.
table
Hard 4 vs. dealer Q: hit; splitting 2s is not favorable against a strong upcard.
table
Hard 8 vs. Q: hit.
table
Hard 12 vs. Q: hit; the count is not high enough to favor standing.
table
Hard 14 vs. dealer Q: hit; the count is not high enough to favor standing.
table
Recounted all 128 exposed cards: Hi-Lo running count +5, about +1.4 true count with roughly 3.5 decks remaining; still near neutral, so minimum bet.
table
Count looks only modestly positive; stay at minimum until a clearly favorable true count appears.
table
Hi-Lo count is +5 after 128 exposed cards, about +1.4 true count with roughly 3.5 decks remaining; keep the minimum bet.
table
Standing on hard 16 vs. dealer 3; basic strategy favors standing.
table
Standing on 20 vs dealer 3; count is modestly positive, about +1.4 true.
table
Soft 13 vs. dealer 3: hit; doubling is not favored against this upcard.
table
Recounted the 140 visible cards: Hi-Lo running count +6, roughly +1.5 to +2 true count. Mildly favorable, so I’m raising modestly to 10.
table
Hi-Lo count is around +6 after 140 exposed cards, roughly +1.8 true count with about 3.3 decks remaining. Mildly favorable; a modest 10-chip bet seems reasonable.
table
Agree on 10: Hi-Lo is about +6 after 140 cards, roughly +1.8 true count; modestly favorable.
table
Standing on soft 20 against dealer 9.
table
Hard 7 versus dealer 9: hit; the hand is too weak to stand or double.
table
Hard 17 vs. dealer 9: stand; hitting risks busting and standing is standard strategy.
table
Hard 14 vs. dealer 9: hit; the count is not high enough to favor standing.
table
After 149 exposed cards I count Hi-Lo at about +4; still only mildly favorable, so keep the minimum bet.
table
After 149 exposed cards, Hi-Lo is about +4 (roughly +1.3 true count); still below a meaningful betting edge, so minimum bet.
table
Hi-Lo count appears about +4 after 149 exposed cards (roughly +1.3 true); keep bets at the minimum.
table
Standing on hard 17 versus dealer Q.
table
Hard 14 vs. Q: hit; the count is only mildly positive and not enough to justify standing.
table
Hard 16 vs. Q; the visible Hi-Lo count is mildly positive, favoring standing at this count.
table
Count has been mildly positive but below a clear betting edge; minimum bet this round.
table
Count remains only mildly positive, so I’m keeping the minimum bet.
table
Recent cards have reduced the mildly positive count; it appears near neutral now, so minimum bet.
table
Standing on hard 19 vs dealer 7.
table
Standing on hard 19 against dealer 7.
table
Standing on hard 18 vs dealer 7.
table
The visible count appears near neutral; I recommend keeping minimum bets this round.
table
Count appears near neutral; keep minimum bets.
table
The visible count appears near neutral; minimum bet this round.
table
Hard 15 vs. ace: hit; no surrender is available, and standing is inferior at this count.
table
Standing on hard 18 against dealer ace.
table
Recounted 180 exposed cards: Hi-Lo running count is about -2, roughly -0.8 true count with 2.5 decks remaining. Minimum bet.
table
Visible Hi-Lo count appears slightly negative; stay at the minimum bet.
table
Visible Hi-Lo count is slightly negative; minimum bet remains appropriate.
table
Hard 16 vs ace: hit; no surrender is available, and the count is slightly negative.
table
Standing on hard 17 against dealer ace.
table
Hard 7 vs. dealer ace: hit; doubling and standing are inferior here.
table
Standing on hard 17 vs dealer ace.
table
Recent count reports are slightly negative; stay at the minimum bet.
table
Recent count reports are slightly negative; keep minimum bets.
table
Count appears slightly negative; keep the minimum bet.
table
Hard 12 vs. ace: hit; the slightly negative count doesn't support standing.
table
Standing on 20 versus dealer ace.
table
Standing on 20 against dealer ace.
table
Visible Hi-Lo count remains roughly neutral to slightly negative; minimum bet for the final round.
table
Visible count appears slightly negative; minimum bet for the final round.
table
Count remains around neutral to slightly negative; keeping the minimum for the final round.
table
Doubling hard 9 against dealer 3; this is the standard favorable play.
table
Standing on hard 13 vs. dealer 3; basic strategy favors standing.
table
These are the messages the models sent to each other at the table.
Team result
Team -17 chips over 20 rounds
All seats share one bankroll. Seat figures show each hand's contribution.
One table is a sample. Leaderboards include sample sizes and intervals.
