Roulette table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A 100-chip red bet pays 1:1, so I need five net wins before ruin; that is the best balance of variance and bankroll survival I can find within 20 spins.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Only reaching 1,500 counts, so I'm spreading the maximum 200 across eight straight-ups at 25 each: any single hit nets about +700 and clears the target, at roughly 8/38 per spin.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need +800 from 700 in 17 spins, so I'm taking a bold even-money bet at the 100 per-bet cap rather than grinding small stakes.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need a 700-chip gain, and eight straight-up bets of 25 each give a win that reaches 1500 with probability 8/38, the highest single-spin success chance within the 200 total-stake cap.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need +900 in 14 spins, and a hit on six straight-ups at 30 each returns exactly 1500 net of the other losses, which maximises the chance of reaching the target per spin within the 200 total stake cap.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need +1080 in 13 spins, so a single-spin shot is the best reach-target line: five straights at 40 each (200 total) win 1660 on any hit, reaching 1500, and a miss leaves 220 with spins still left.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1660, above the 1500 target, and only finishing at or above target counts, so skipping this spin protects that position without risking a drop below it.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll of 1660 already exceeds the 1500 target, so I skip this spin to avoid any risk of dropping below it.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1660, above the 1500 target, and only reaching the target counts, so skipping this spin protects the success condition without any downside.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll of 1660 already exceeds the 1500 target, and only reaching the target counts, so placing no bet protects that lead.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1660, above the 1500 target, and only reaching the target counts, so placing no bets keeps the success condition secure.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1660, above the 1500 target, and only reaching the target counts, so placing no bets protects that result.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

With bankroll 1660 already above the 1500 target, any bet only adds risk of dropping below it, so skipping preserves the success condition.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Already at 1660, above the 1500 target, so placing no bets keeps the lead with no variance risk.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll of 1660 already exceeds the 1500 target, so I skip to protect that lead rather than risk it on further spins.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll of 1660 already exceeds the 1500 target, and only reaching the target counts, so skipping this spin preserves the result without risking a drop below it.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll of 1660 already exceeds the 1500 target, and skipping is unpenalised, so placing no bets keeps the target secured without added risk.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll of 1660 already exceeds the 1500 target, and only reaching the target counts, so placing any bet risks falling below it; I'll skip the final spin.