Craps table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have a house edge, and no odds bets are currently offered. Sitting out preserves chips and avoids expected loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I’m sitting out this roll: every available wager has negative expected value, and no bet best preserves my chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has positive expected value, and no odds bets are currently offered. Passing preserves my bankroll; the prior streak does not change the independent dice odds.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets carry negative expected value, and there are no odds bets available this roll. Leaving the table empty minimizes expected loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have negative expected value, while keeping my chips unbet preserves their full expected value.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A don't-come wager has a comparatively low house edge among the available bets. I’ll use the maximum stake and avoid adding higher-edge bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add the maximum legal laid odds behind my existing don't-come 5. These odds carry no house edge and improve odds utilization without adding another flat bet.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing don't-come 5 and laid odds: with the point already established, the bet has favorable conditional odds, while the odds add no house edge. Avoid adding new bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All currently available wagers carry a house edge, and no odds bets are available. I’ll preserve my bankroll rather than take a negative-EV bet.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No bet has positive expected value; preserving bankroll is optimal for maximizing expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No wager has positive expected value; sitting out preserves my bankroll rather than accepting a house edge.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A small don't-come wager has a lower house edge than the other available bets; avoid adding exposure to higher-edge wagers.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have a negative expected value, so the best way to preserve chips is not to wager.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available wagers have negative expected value, so preserving chips by sitting out maximizes expected bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Every available wager has negative expected value, and free odds are not available in the legal actions. Passing preserves chips and maximizes expected bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available wager has positive expected value. Sitting this roll preserves chips and avoids the house edge.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No bet has positive expected value; passing preserves the bankroll and avoids paying the house edge.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No wager has zero expected loss; every available bet has a house edge, and the recent roll history does not change the odds.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available wagers have negative expected value, and no bet preserves my chips. Recent rolls do not predict the next independent roll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has positive expected value; preserving chips is better than taking a house-edge wager.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Every available wager has negative expected value, and the recent rolls do not predict independent future dice. With no favorable-odds bets available, preserving chips is optimal.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Every available wager has negative expected value, so the best way to maximize expected chips is not to bet.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available wager has positive expected value; passing preserves bankroll rather than accepting a house edge.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have negative expected value, and there are no odds bets available here to reduce the house edge. Passing preserves the most chips in expectation.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available wager has positive expected value; abstaining preserves chips and avoids unnecessary house edge.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I’m sitting out: every available bet has negative expected value, and there are no odds bets available to offset a flat bet’s house edge.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

The don't-pass bet has the lowest house edge among the available bets. I’m avoiding higher-edge wagers; prior rolls do not change the odds of this independent roll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add the maximum legal laid odds behind the existing $100 don't-pass on 6. Odds pay true odds and carry no house edge, improving odds utilization without adding a negative-EV wager.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No wager has positive expected value. With no required bet, preserving the bankroll maximizes expected chips over the remaining rolls.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A don't-come flat bet has a slightly lower house edge than a come bet. Prior rolls and the shooter’s streak do not change the independent dice odds.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have negative expected value, and the best way to maximize expected chips is not to wager.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I’m leaving the table action empty: all available bets have negative expected value, and no odds bets are currently legal.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available wager has positive expected value; preserving the bankroll is the best way to maximize expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No bet has positive expected value; with only seven decision rolls remaining, passing preserves the bankroll and avoids the house edge.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has positive expected value; with no odds available, passing avoids a guaranteed negative expectation.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I’m sitting this roll out: every available bet has negative expected value, and no odds bets are available.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available wagers have negative expected value, and no odds bets are available. With only four decision rolls remaining, passing preserves my chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No wager has positive expected value; with only three decision rolls remaining, preserving the bankroll is better than taking a negative-edge bet.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available wagers have negative expected value, and with only two decision rolls left there is no positive-EV odds wager to take. I’ll preserve my bankroll rather than add a losing bet.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

With only one decision roll remaining, every available wager has negative expected value. I’ll preserve the bankroll rather than take a house-edge bet.