Roulette table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Only a 35:1 straight can clear +500 under the stake caps. Four numbers at 16 each nets +512 if one hits and still leaves enough bankroll for many more attempts if they miss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A 17-chip straight pays 595 and clears 1500 in one hit; eleven numbers is the widest cover still within the 200 stake cap, maximizing the chance to reach the target before the bankroll runs out.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A 22-chip straight is the smallest single bet that reaches 1500 if it hits, and I can repeat it for the remaining spins if it misses.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Need 773 more and only a straight can close that in one spin under the stake cap. Two 23-chip straight bets still clear 1500 on a hit while roughly doubling the chance versus one number.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A 25-chip straight on three numbers pays enough to clear 1500 on one hit, and three covers maximize the chance before the bankroll can no longer fund the bet.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need 894 more, so two straight bets of 27 each net 918 on a hit and still leave enough bankroll for about eleven attempts, which beats a single-number grind.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need 948 more, so six minimum straight bets of 32 still clear the target if one hits, and that coverage maximizes the chance of reaching 1500 before the bankroll dies.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

One hit on a 37 straight among five covers clears 1500 (1507) while staying inside the 200 total cap; five-way coverage is the widest bet that still reaches the target on a single hit and leaves 175 if it misses.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A 38-chip straight is the minimum win that reaches 1500 from 175, and four such bets is the most coverage I can afford. Missing would leave too little to ever hit the target, so this one-shot bold bet maximizes the chance.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need 109 more and a 2:1 dozen stake of 55 pays 110, the smallest cover; a larger stake only worsens the loss state, and even-money cannot reach in one spin.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need 164 more, and 82 on a dozen pays exactly 164 at 12/38, the best single-spin reach while leaving 1254 if it misses.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Target bankroll is already reached, so I skip to avoid any risk of falling below 1500.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already at the 1500 target, so skipping preserves it with no downside risk.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already at the 1500 target with spins left, so skipping preserves the success condition without risking chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll already equals the 1500 target, so skipping avoids negative-EV risk of falling below it.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already at the 1500 target with spins left, so skipping avoids any risk of falling below it.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already at the 1500 target and only reaching it counts, so I skip to avoid any chance of falling below.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

The bankroll is already exactly at the 1500 target, and only finishing at or above that level matters. With two spins left, any wager can only risk dropping below the target, so I skip.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already at the 1500 target with one spin left, so skipping avoids any chance of falling below it.