Roulette table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A four-number straight cover at 16 each nets just over 500 on a hit while keeping the spin cost low enough for many attempts, which best fits a 500-chip target under the stake caps.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A 564 gap needs at least 17 on one number; four straights at 18 still clear it on a hit and buy 13 tries, the best constant coverage I can afford.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A 19-chip straight pays 665 profit and reaches 1500 in one hit, the smallest stake that does so under the 35:1 payout.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need 655 more, and two straight bets of 20 each net 680 if either hits, which clears the target while keeping the loss small enough to repeat this for many of the 16 spins left.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A 20-chip straight pays 700 and clears 1500 on a hit, and the bankroll supports that sized attempt on every remaining spin.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need 715 more with 14 spins left, so I cover three straights at 23: one hit nets enough to reach 1500, and the 69 total stake leaves about eleven attempts, which beats fewer or more numbers.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

With 784 needed, a 23-chip straight bet pays 805 profit and reaches the target in one hit while risking the least under a bold single-bet policy.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Need 807 more with 12 spins left, so two straight-ups at 24 each reach the target on one hit while leaving enough bankroll for repeated attempts.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need 855 more with 10 spins left, so a max dozen stake is the best reach-target step: a hit cuts the gap enough to improve later straight coverage, while a loss still leaves multiple attempts.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need 955 more and only nine spins, so I take the widest one-hit reach of the target: six straights at 32, which pays 960 profit if any hits and stays within the stake caps.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already above the 1500 target, so skipping preserves it with no downside risk.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Target bankroll is already reached, so skipping avoids any chance of falling back below 1500.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already above the 1500 target, so I skip to avoid any risk of falling below it.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already above 1500, so skipping preserves the target with no downside.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already above 1500, so skipping avoids any chance of falling back below the target.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already above the 1500 target, so skipping preserves the win with no downside risk.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already above the 1500 target with spins left, so skipping avoids any chance of falling back below the goal.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already above the 1500 target with one spin left, so skipping avoids any chance of falling below the goal.