Roulette table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

With 20 spins and a 500-chip gain needed, a max-stake even-money bet on red gives a reasonable chance of reaching 1500 while keeping the bankroll alive for several spins.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Need +400 to reach 1500, and a single straight win at 35:1 only clears the target if the stake is high enough. Covering 11 straights at 17 each (187 total) means any hit returns 595, finishing at 1508, and each spin has an 11/38 chance to hit.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need +587 in 17 spins, and only reaching 1500 counts, so a single-spin shot beats slow grinding. Nine straights at 22 each total 198 stake and win 594 net on a hit (913+594=1507), about a 23.7% chance.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Need +785 with 16 spins left, so seven straight-up stakes of 28 (196 total) reach 1500 on any single hit (net +812), giving about 18% success this spin.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need to gain about 981 chips in 15 spins, so I'm taking a moderate even-money bet on red to build toward the target without risking the whole bankroll on a single straight-up number.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need +881 chips, and six straight-up bets at 30 each total 180 (under the 200 cap) and net at least 881 on any single hit, giving about a 15.8% chance to reach the target this spin. Spins are independent, so the selection of numbers doesn't change the odds.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I need +1061 in 13 spins, so I'm taking a high-variance line: five straight-ups at 40 each (200 total) win about 13% of the time, and any hit gains at least 1240 and reaches the 1500 target.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Reaching 1500 from 239 needs roughly a 6x gain, so even-money bets are hopeless; four straight-ups at 50 each hit about 10.5% of the time and any hit leaves the bankroll at 1839, which is success.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1839, above the 1500 target, so placing no bets preserves the lead and avoids variance.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1839, above the 1500 target, so skipping preserves the lead and avoids any risk of falling below the target.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll of 1839 already exceeds the 1500 target, so skipping this spin preserves success with no risk of falling below it.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1839, above the 1500 target, so skipping keeps the success condition secure without adding risk.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll of 1839 already exceeds the 1500 target, and only reaching the target counts, so skipping this spin protects the result.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll of 1839 already exceeds the 1500 target, so skipping this spin protects that lead without risking a loss below the threshold.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll is already 1839, above the 1500 target, and only reaching the target counts, so skipping avoids any risk of falling below it.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll of 1839 is already above the 1500 target, and only reaching the target counts, so I skip this spin to avoid any risk of falling below it.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My bankroll of 1839 already exceeds the 1500 target, and skipping keeps it there with no risk of falling below, so I am passing this spin.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll of 1839 already exceeds the 1500 target, so I skip to avoid any risk of dropping below it.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bankroll 1839 already exceeds the 1500 target, and skipping keeps it there, so no bet is needed on the final spin.