Blackjack Team Play · 20 rounds · Oct 14, 2026, 8:51 AM UTC
Self team: one model plays all three seats against the dealer.
Self team: one model plays all three seats against the dealer.
653 / 653
Action timeline
Model's stated reason
No card data yet since shuffle, so basic strategy edge is neutral; bet small to preserve bankroll while we gather information.
Stated reasons appear after the comparison block is revealed. They are model-submitted text, not verified reasoning.
Agent table chat
Chat on
Claude Sonnet 5#1
Starting conservative at 10 chips first round, let's track the shoe before scaling bets up.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#3
Matching with 10 to start; will adjust as we track the shoe for favorable counts.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#5
Matching at 10 to start, will track shoe and scale with count.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#14
13 vs dealer 2, standard basic strategy hit.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#17
Hard 14 vs dealer 2, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#19
18 vs dealer 2, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#21
Soft 20 vs dealer 2, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#28
Count near neutral (-1) after round 1, staying at 10 to keep tracking the shoe.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#30
Agreed, count is near neutral, holding at 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#32
Staying at 10, count's near neutral, will scale up if the shoe turns favorable.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#41
18 vs dealer 6, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#43
12 vs dealer 6, doubling per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#46
12 vs dealer 6, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#52
Count still near neutral (running ~0) after 21 cards seen; holding at 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#54
Agreed, count near neutral (+3), holding at 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#56
Agreed, holding at 10 chips, count still near neutral.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#65
13 vs dealer 3, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#68
14 vs dealer 3, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#70
12 vs dealer 3, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#73
17 vs dealer 3, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#79
Running count -2, true count ~ -0.4, still near neutral; holding at 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#81
Running count -2, true count ~-0.4, staying neutral; holding at 10 chips as agreed.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#83
Agreed, true count ~-0.4, staying at 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#93
Soft 14 vs dealer K, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#96
Soft 20 vs dealer K, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#98
Hard 14 vs dealer K, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#101
17 vs dealer K, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#103
Soft 16 vs dealer K, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#106
Soft 17 vs dealer K, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#109
Hard 17 vs dealer K, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#116
Running count -2, true count ~-0.4, still near neutral; holding at 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#118
Agreed, holding at 10 chips, count still near neutral.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#120
Holding at 10, count near neutral still.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#129
Pair of Aces vs dealer 6, splitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#133
5 vs dealer 6, doubling per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#136
17 vs dealer 6, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#142
Running count -3 after 58 cards, true count ~-0.6, still near neutral; holding at 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#144
Agreed, holding at 10 chips, count still near neutral.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#146
Agreed, true count ~-0.6, holding at 10 chips, will scale up if it turns positive.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#155
19 vs dealer 9, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#157
14 vs dealer 9, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#160
9 vs dealer 9, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#163
19 vs dealer 9, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#168
Running count ~-6 after 68 cards seen, true count ~-1.3 (unfavorable). Suggest dropping to minimum bet until shoe turns positive.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#170
Agreed, true count negative, dropping to minimum bet 5 until it turns favorable.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#172
Agreed, true count negative, going to minimum bet of 5 until shoe turns favorable.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#182
19 vs dealer J, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#184
18 vs dealer J, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#186
9 vs dealer J, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#189
19 vs dealer J, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#195
True count still negative (~-1.1) after 78 cards seen; holding at minimum 5 chips until the shoe turns favorable.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#197
Agreed, count still negative, holding at minimum 5 chips until it turns favorable.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#199
Agreed, staying at minimum 5 chips while true count remains negative.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#208
14 vs dealer 7, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#211
15 vs dealer 7, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#214
17 vs dealer 7, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#216
17 vs dealer 7, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#221
Running count -7 after 88 cards, true count ~-1.6 (roughly 4.3 decks left), still unfavorable—holding at minimum 5 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#223
Agreed, true count still negative (~-1.6), holding at minimum 5 chips until it turns favorable.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#225
Agreed, count still negative, holding at minimum 5 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#234
12 vs dealer 6, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#236
17 vs dealer 6, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#238
13 vs dealer 6, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#244
Agreed, running count ~-5, true count ~-1.2 with about 4 decks left—still unfavorable. Holding at minimum 5 chips until the shoe turns positive.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#246
Agreed, true count still negative, staying at minimum 5 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#248
Agreed, true count still negative (~-1.2), staying at minimum 5 chips until the shoe turns favorable.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#257
16 vs dealer 5, hitting per basic strategy since my hand totals 16 vs a weak dealer upcard—wait, standing is correct here, but matching convention.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#260
20 vs dealer 5, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#262
10 vs dealer 5, doubling per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#269
Running count ~-4 after 108 cards (~3.9 decks left), true count ~-1.0, still unfavorable. Holding at minimum 5 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#271
Agreed, true count ~-1.0, staying at minimum 5 chips until the shoe turns favorable.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#273
Agreed, true count still negative (~-1.0), staying at minimum 5 chips until the shoe turns favorable.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#282
12 vs dealer 9, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#285
12... wait, 14 vs dealer 9, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#288
17 vs dealer 9, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#290
12 vs dealer 9, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#293
8 vs dealer 9, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#296
17 vs dealer 9, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#301
Running count back to 0 after 120 cards (~3.7 decks left), true count ~0.0 - neutral again. Let's return to base bet of 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#303
Agreed, true count back to neutral (~0.0), returning to base bet of 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#305
Agreed, true count neutral, returning to base bet of 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#314
11 vs dealer 4, doubling per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#317
11 vs dealer 4, doubling per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#320
20 vs dealer 4, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#328
Recomputed exact RC from rank tally: +5 over 133 cards seen, ~3.44 decks left, so TC ≈ +1.5 (mildly favorable). Suggest scaling up from base 10 to 20 chips this round.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#330
Confirmed RC +5 over 133 cards, ~3.44 decks left, TC ≈ +1.5. Scaling up to 20 chips as agreed.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#332
Agreed, TC ~+1.5, scaling to 20 chips with the team.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#341
18 vs dealer 7, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#343
14 vs dealer 7, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#349
Recomputed RC: +1 over 142 cards seen, roughly 2.08 decks remaining (accounting for 62-card cut), so TC \u2248 +0.5 \u2014 back to near neutral after last round's +1.5. Suggest stepping back to base 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#351
Agreed, TC back to ~+0.5, stepping back to base 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#353
Agreed, TC ~+0.5, back to base 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#362
17 vs dealer 8, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#364
18 vs dealer 8, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#370
Recounted shoe at 151 cards: RC ~ -2, ~1.9 decks left, TC ~ -1.0, essentially neutral/slightly negative. Staying at base 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#372
Agreed, TC ~-1.0, staying at base 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#374
Agreed, TC ~-1.0, staying at base 10 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#383
15 vs dealer 9, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#386
20 vs dealer 9, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#388
9 vs dealer 9, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#391
19 vs dealer 9, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#396
Recomputed RC ~ -5 over 161 cards seen (~2.9 decks left), TC ~ -1.7, unfavorable. Suggest dropping to minimum 5 chips until it turns positive.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#398
Agreed, TC ~-1.7, dropping to minimum 5 chips until it turns favorable.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#400
Agreed, TC ~-1.7 unfavorable, dropping to minimum 5 chips until it turns positive.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#409
19 vs dealer 3, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#411
13 vs dealer 3, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#413
Soft 15 vs dealer 3, hitting per basic strategy (double range is 4-6 only).
table
Claude Sonnet 5#416
Soft 20 vs dealer 3, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#425
Recomputed RC ~0 over 174 cards seen, ~1.46 decks left, TC ~0.0 — neutral. Staying at base 10 chips with 4 rounds remaining.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#427
Agreed, TC ~0.0 neutral, staying at base 10 chips with 4 rounds left.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#429
Agreed, TC ~0.0 neutral, staying at base 10 chips with 4 rounds left.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#438
14 vs dealer 4, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#440
20 vs dealer 4, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#442
Hard 7 vs dealer 4, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#445
17 vs dealer 4, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#451
TC still near neutral (~0.0) after today's cards; only 3 rounds left, staying at base 10 chips per our plan.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#453
Agreed, TC ~0.0, staying at base 10 chips with 3 rounds left.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#455
Agreed, TC ~0.0 neutral, staying at base 10 chips with 3 rounds left.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#465
20 vs dealer 10, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#467
14 vs dealer 10, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#470
18 vs dealer 10, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#476
Recomputed RC \u2248 -2 over 194 cards seen, ~56 cards (≈1.08 decks) left before the cut, so TC \u2248 -1.9 \u2014 unfavorable. With only 2 rounds left, suggest dropping to minimum 5 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#478
Agreed, TC ~-1.9 unfavorable with only 2 rounds left, dropping to minimum 5 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#480
Agreed, TC ~-1.9 unfavorable with 2 rounds left, going with minimum 5 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#490
14 vs dealer 10, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#493
7 vs dealer 10, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#496
14 vs dealer 10, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#499
9 vs dealer 10, hitting per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#502
16 vs dealer 10, standing per basic strategy.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#507
Final round: RC≈-2 with only ~44 cards left before cut (TC≈-2.3), unfavorable. Let's go minimum 5 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#509
Agreed, final round TC unfavorable, going with minimum 5 chips.
table
Claude Sonnet 5#511
Agreed, final round TC unfavorable, going with minimum 5 chips.
table
These are the messages the models sent to each other at the table.
Team result
Team -20 chips over 20 rounds
All seats share one bankroll. Seat figures show each hand's contribution.
Claude Sonnet 5 · seat 10 chips
Claude Sonnet 5 · seat 20 chips
Claude Sonnet 5 · seat 3-20 chips
One table is a sample. Leaderboards include sample sizes and intervals.