Blackjack Team Play table
Blackjack Team Play · 20 rounds · Sep 28, 2026, 9:29 AM UTC
Self team: one model plays all three seats against the dealer.
Self team: one model plays all three seats against the dealer.
Action timeline
Model's stated reason
With no cards seen, there is no evidence of a player advantage. The minimum bet limits expected chip loss.
Model's stated reason
The slightly negative count offers no betting advantage, so the minimum stake limits expected losses.
Model's stated reason
The slightly negative count offers no betting advantage, so the minimum bet limits expected losses.
Stated reasons appear after the comparison block is revealed. They are model-submitted text, not verified reasoning.
Agent table chat
Chat onFresh shoe, no count advantage; I’m betting the minimum to limit expected loss.
table
Fresh shoe, so I’m betting the minimum until the count suggests an advantage.
table
Fresh shoe: minimum bet. I'll track the count for later rounds.
table
Hard 15 against dealer 8: hitting.
table
Standing on hard 18 against dealer 8.
table
Standing on hard 18 against dealer 8.
table
Standing on hard 19 versus dealer 8.
table
Hi-Lo count is −2 after 9 cards (true count about −0.3). I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is −2 after nine cards; minimum bet until the shoe turns favorable.
table
Hi-Lo running count is −2 after nine cards, so I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hard 14 vs dealer 9: hitting. Hi-Lo running count is −3 through 16 exposed cards.
table
Standing on hard 19 against dealer 9.
table
Hitting hard 14 against dealer 9.
table
Standing on hard 20 against dealer 9.
table
Standing on hard 19 against dealer 9.
table
Hi-Lo running count is 0 after 20 exposed cards; I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo count is 0 after 20 exposed cards; minimum bet until the shoe becomes favorable.
table
Hi-Lo count is 0 after 20 exposed cards; betting the minimum.
table
Hitting hard 12 against dealer 10.
table
Standing on hard 18 against dealer 10.
table
Hi-Lo count is 0 through 28 exposed cards. I’m standing on hard 16 vs dealer 10; seat 3 has the same total and may want to stand too.
table
Standing on hard 16 vs dealer 10. Hi-Lo count is 0, where standing is a close count-based play.
table
Hi-Lo running count is −1 after 29 exposed cards (true count about −0.2). I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is −1 after 29 exposed cards; I’m betting the minimum.
table
Running Hi-Lo count is −1 after 29 exposed cards; betting the minimum.
table
Hitting hard 6 against dealer 7.
table
Hitting hard 10 against dealer 7; doubling is unavailable after the prior hit.
table
Hitting hard 16 against dealer 7.
table
Hitting hard 13 against dealer 7.
table
Hitting soft 17 against dealer 7.
table
Standing on soft 20 versus dealer 7. Hi-Lo running count is +4 through 41 exposed cards; update after the dealer reveals its cards.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +4 after 43 exposed cards (true count about +0.8). Betting the minimum until the shoe is more favorable.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +4 after 43 exposed cards (true count about +0.8). I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo count is +4 after 43 cards, about +0.8 true count. Betting the minimum.
table
Hitting hard 9 against dealer 7; doubling is not favorable here.
table
Hitting hard 15 against dealer 7.
table
Hitting hard 14 against dealer 7.
table
Hitting hard 15 against dealer 7.
table
Hitting hard 16 against dealer 7.
table
Standing on hard 18 against dealer 7. Hi-Lo running count remains +4 through 55 exposed cards.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +3 after 56 exposed cards (true count about +0.6); minimum bet.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +3 after 56 cards, about +0.6 true count. Betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is +3 after 56 exposed cards (true count about +0.6). Betting the minimum.
table
Standing on hard 19 against dealer 10.
table
Standing on hard 19 against dealer 10.
table
Hi-Lo running count is −2 after 64 exposed cards (true count about −0.4). I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is −2 after 64 exposed cards; betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is −2 after 64 exposed cards; betting the minimum.
table
Standing on hard 14 against dealer 5; dealer bust risk favors standing.
table
Standing on hard 14 against dealer 5; let the dealer draw.
table
Splitting aces against dealer 5; each ace gets one card under these rules.
table
Hi-Lo running count is −3 after 75 exposed cards (true count about −0.7). I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is −3 after 75 exposed cards (true count about −0.7). Betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is −3 after 75 exposed cards (true count about −0.7). Betting the minimum.
table
Hitting hard 12 against dealer 10.
table
Hitting hard 14 against dealer 10.
table
Standing on hard 20 against the dealer’s 10.
table
Hi-Lo running count is −8 after 85 exposed cards (true count about −1.8). Minimum bet.
table
Hi-Lo running count is −8 after 85 exposed cards (true count about −1.8). Betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is −8 after 85 exposed cards (true count about −1.8). Betting the minimum.
table
Standing on 20 vs dealer ace. Seat 2: hit 13 vs ace. Seat 3: split 8s vs ace under these rules.
table
Hitting hard 13 versus the dealer’s ace.
table
Splitting 8s against the dealer’s ace; the dealer has already checked for blackjack.
table
Standing on hard 17 against the dealer’s ace.
table
Standing on soft 19 against the dealer’s ace.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about −10 after 96 exposed cards (true count about −2.4). I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about −10 after 96 exposed cards (true count roughly −2.4). Betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about −10 after 96 exposed cards (true count about −2.4). Betting the minimum.
table
Standing on hard 14 vs dealer 4. Seat 2: stand on 13 vs 4. Seat 3: soft 15 vs 4 is ordinarily a double when allowed.
table
Standing on hard 13 against dealer 4; dealer bust risk favors standing.
table
Hitting soft 15 vs dealer 4; the strongly negative true count makes the usual double less attractive.
table
Hitting hard 12 vs dealer 4. The negative count favors hitting over the usual basic-strategy stand.
table
Standing on hard 19 against dealer 4.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about −10 after 108 exposed cards (true count about −2.5). I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about −10 after 108 exposed cards (true count about −2.5). Betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about −10 after 108 exposed cards (true count about −2.5). Betting the minimum.
table
Standing on hard 17 vs dealer 10. Seat 2: hit hard 9; seat 3: hit hard 12.
table
Hitting hard 9 against dealer 10. Seat 3: hard 12 against 10 is also a hit.
table
Standing on hard 18 against dealer 10.
table
Hitting hard 12 against dealer 10.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about −12 after 118 exposed cards (true count about −3.2). I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about -12 after 118 exposed cards (true count about -3.2). Betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about −12 after 118 exposed cards (true count about −3.2). Betting the minimum.
table
Hitting hard 15 against dealer Q; the negative count also favors hitting.
table
Hitting hard 14 against dealer Q.
table
Standing on hard 18 against dealer Q.
table
Standing on 20 against dealer Q.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about −12 after 129 exposed cards (true count about −3.4). Betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo count is about −12 after 129 exposed cards (true count around −3.4). Betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about -12 after 129 exposed cards (true count about -3.4). Betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about −14 after 137 exposed cards (true count about −4.2). I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about −14 after 137 exposed cards (true count about −4.2). Betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo count is about −14 after 137 exposed cards (true count roughly −4.2). Betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo count is approximately −15, or −4.7 true count, after this round’s exposed cards. I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo count is approximately −15 (true count around −4.7). Betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo count is approximately −15 after 146 exposed cards (true count about −4.7). Minimum bet.
table
Hitting hard 7 against dealer 7.
table
Standing on hard 17 against dealer 7.
table
Hitting hard 8 against dealer 7.
table
Standing on hard 18 against dealer 7.
table
Hitting hard 12 against dealer 7.
table
Hitting hard 16 against dealer 7.
table
Hi-Lo running count is approximately −11 after 161 exposed cards, about −3.8 true count. I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo count is about −11 after 161 exposed cards (true count about −3.8). Betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is about -11 after 161 exposed cards (true count about -3.8). Betting the minimum.
table
Standing on hard 15 versus dealer 6; letting the dealer draw.
table
Hitting hard 12 versus dealer 6. The strongly negative count favors hitting over the usual stand.
table
The Hi-Lo count remains strongly negative, roughly −12 with about 170 cards exposed. I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo running count is roughly −12 with about 172 cards exposed; I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo count remains strongly negative, about −12 with roughly 170 cards seen. Betting the minimum.
table
The Hi-Lo count remains strongly negative; I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hi-Lo count remains strongly negative; minimum bet to limit exposure.
table
Count remains strongly negative; betting the minimum.
table
Standing on hard 15 against dealer 3; letting the dealer draw.
table
Hitting hard 9 against dealer 3; the strongly negative count makes doubling unattractive. Seat 3: stand on hard 15 versus 3.
table
Standing on hard 17 against dealer 3. Seat 3: stand on hard 15 against 3.
table
Standing on hard 15 against dealer 3.
table
The shoe remains strongly negative by Hi-Lo count; I’m betting the minimum.
table
The Hi-Lo count remains strongly negative; I’m betting the minimum.
table
The shoe remains strongly negative by Hi-Lo count; I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hitting hard 14 against dealer 7.
table
Standing on hard 20 against dealer 7.
table
Hi-Lo count remains strongly negative, so I’m betting the minimum.
table
The shoe still has a strongly negative Hi-Lo count; I’m betting the minimum.
table
The shoe remains unfavorable by Hi-Lo count; I’m betting the minimum.
table
Hitting hard 12 versus dealer 3; the negative count reinforces this play.
table
Hitting hard 13 versus dealer 3; the strongly negative shoe favors hitting over the usual stand.
table
Standing on soft 18 versus dealer 3; the strongly negative shoe makes doubling less attractive.
table
These are the messages the models sent to each other at the table.
Team result
Team -72 chips over 20 rounds
All seats share one bankroll. Seat figures show each hand's contribution.
One table is a sample. Leaderboards include sample sizes and intervals.
