Showdown Hold'em table
Showdown Hold’em · 30 hands · Oct 14, 2026, 8:54 AM UTC
Action timeline
Model's stated reason
54o does not meet the optimal preflop 4x raising threshold, so checking to see the flop is the standard play.
Model's stated reason
Holding five-high with no pair and only runner-runner draw potential on an ace-high board, checking to see the river for free is optimal.
Model's stated reason
Playing the board with Ace-Ace-Ten-Eight-Seven gives zero chance of winning against the dealer, making folding at -20 chips higher expected value than calling.
Model's stated reason
Pocket Queens is a premium pair well above the threshold (33+) for a 4x preflop raise in Ultimate Texas Hold'em.
Model's stated reason
Ad-Tc contains an Ace, which is well within the standard optimal 4x raising range (any ace, pairs 33+, K5o+, Q8o+, JTo+).
Model's stated reason
Pocket sevens is well within the standard 4x raising range (33+), maximizing expected value preflop.
Model's stated reason
In Ultimate Texas Hold'em, any Ace is an optimal 4x raise preflop.
Model's stated reason
43 offsuit is well below the preflop 4x raising threshold, so checking to see the flop for free is standard optimal play.
Model's stated reason
With four-high and no draw on an ace-high board, checking to see the remaining cards for free is optimal.
Model's stated reason
I hold two pair (fours and threes), which beats all of the dealer's single-pair hands and non-qualifying holdings. Raising 1x has clear positive expected value over folding.
Model's stated reason
T3s is well below the standard 4x raising threshold (which requires J8s+ or pairs/high broadways). Checking to see the flop.
Model's stated reason
On a flop of Jc-Tc-4c with hole cards Td-3d, we have middle pair (tens). Standard optimal strategy calls for a 2x raise with middle pair or better.
Model's stated reason
Q5o falls below the standard optimal preflop 4x raising threshold of Q8o+, so checking to see the flop is the standard play.
Model's stated reason
With only queen-high on a paired board and no substantial draw, checking is optimal to see the turn and river for free.
Model's stated reason
With a pair of Kings and an Ace-Queen kicker on board, our hand beats a significant portion of unpaired dealer hands while the dealer always qualifies.
Model's stated reason
T7s is below the standard preflop 4x raise threshold, so checking to see the flop is optimal.
Model's stated reason
Holding ten-high with no made pair or meaningful draw on a J-4-3 flop, checking is clearly superior to committing additional chips.
Model's stated reason
We have only King-high with a Ten kicker on a board where any Ace or Five makes a straight, giving us virtually zero showdown value to justify a 1x bet.
Model's stated reason
54o does not meet the preflop raising threshold in Ultimate Texas Hold'em; checking to see the flop for free is standard.
Model's stated reason
We hold middle pair of fives with a weak four kicker on a board with two diamonds. Checking to see the turn and river has higher expected value than committing a 2x raise.
Model's stated reason
I have a six-high straight (2-3-4-5-6), which is well ahead of the dealer's average holding and clearly warrants a 1x raise on the river.
Model's stated reason
T5o does not meet the preflop 4x raising criteria (which starts at JTo, Q8o+, K5o+, any Ace, or 33+), so checking to see the flop is optimal.
Model's stated reason
On a flop of Qc-Th-4c, holding 5d-Tc gives us middle pair (Tens). Standard optimal strategy calls for a 2x raise with any top or middle pair made with a hole card.
Model's stated reason
K2o is below the standard preflop raise threshold of K5o+ / K2s+, so checking to see the flop is optimal.
Model's stated reason
Holding King-high with no pair or substantial draw on a Q-7-6 flop, checking to see the remaining cards for free is standard.
Model's stated reason
We hold the second-nut King-high flush on a four-spade board, easily justifying the 1x river call.
Model's stated reason
8d 2d is well outside the optimal preflop raising range, so checking to see the flop for free is the highest EV play.
Model's stated reason
With only eight-high and no pair or significant draw on a 7h-Td-3s board, checking is optimal.
Model's stated reason
With only a board pair of threes and an eight kicker, the dealer always qualifies and wins over 85% of runouts, making folding higher EV than raising.
Model's stated reason
72o is well outside the standard preflop raising range in Ultimate Texas Hold'em, making check the optimal decision.
Model's stated reason
Holding seven-high with no made hand and only a backdoor flush draw, checking to see the turn and river for free is optimal.
Model's stated reason
I am playing the board with a pair of fives and J-9-8 kickers, meaning I can at best tie if the dealer also fails to beat the board, making folding the higher EV choice.
Model's stated reason
86o is well below the optimal 4x preflop raising range, so checking to see the flop for free is standard.
Model's stated reason
With only eight-high and no four-card straight or flush draw, checking to see the remaining community cards for free is optimal.
Model's stated reason
With only the board pair of sevens and weak kickers (Jack-Eight-Six), the dealer beats this hand with almost any holding higher than an eight or any paired card. Folding saves the 1x play bet.
Model's stated reason
Holding 8h 3s offsuit falls well below the standard preflop 4x raising threshold, so checking to see the flop is optimal.
Model's stated reason
With an eight-high open-ended straight draw and no made pair, checking to see the turn and river for free preserves equity.
Model's stated reason
Playing only the board with a pair of sevens and an eight kicker means we can never beat the dealer, only push if the dealer cannot improve over a nine kicker, which occurs too infrequently to justify risking the extra play bet against an already-qualifying board.
Model's stated reason
Holding an ace gives sufficient equity to make the maximum 4x preflop raise according to standard basic strategy.
Model's stated reason
K7o meets the standard preflop 4x raising threshold of K5o or better.
Model's stated reason
93 offsuit does not meet the threshold for a preflop 4x or 3x raise; checking is standard.
Model's stated reason
With only 9-high on a paired board and no draws, checking is standard to see the turn and river for free.
Model's stated reason
With two pair (sixes and threes), we beat all of the dealer's unpaired holdings that play the board's pair of sixes, which easily exceeds the ~20% win rate required to make the 1x river bet over folding.
Model's stated reason
65 offsuit is well below the standard preflop raising threshold, so checking to see the flop for free is optimal.
Model's stated reason
With six-high and no direct draw on a paired King-high flop, checking is the clear optimal choice.
Model's stated reason
Playing the board (pair of 9s with KQ7 kickers), I can never win. The dealer ties only with unpaired cards under 7 (~13% of holdings), making folding (-20 chips) better than calling (-26.1 chips EV).
Model's stated reason
72s does not meet the optimal preflop raising criteria, so checking to see the flop for free is the mathematically correct play.
Model's stated reason
Bottom pair with a weak deuce kicker does not meet the threshold to raise 2x on the flop; checking is standard.
Model's stated reason
We have a pair of sevens, which comfortably beats all non-qualifying dealer holdings and several low pairs, making a 1x raise profitable over folding.
Model's stated reason
K3o falls below the optimal preflop 4x raising threshold of K5o+, so checking to see the flop is the correct play.
Model's stated reason
Holding only king-high with weak backdoor draws on an 8-2-4 rainbow board, checking to see the remaining community cards for free is optimal.
Model's stated reason
With only King-high and a three kicker on an 8-2-4-5-T board, my showdown value is insufficient against the dealer's qualifying range and better high cards to justify the 1x play bet.
Model's stated reason
J2o does not meet the preflop 4x raising threshold (JTo+ or J8s+), so checking to see the flop is optimal.
Model's stated reason
With only Jack-high on a paired board and no draws, checking is standard to see the remaining cards for free.
Model's stated reason
The board has a pair of sixes, meaning the dealer qualifies on every holding; with a Jack kicker alongside the board's King, we beat roughly 40% of random dealer holdings, comfortably above the 25% equity threshold required to raise.
Model's stated reason
Q6 offsuit is below the optimal preflop 4x raising threshold of Q8o+ / Q6s+, so checking is optimal.
Model's stated reason
With only a gutshot straight draw and Queen-high on a board of Kd-Jd-3d, checking has higher expectation than committing 2x ante.
Model's stated reason
On the river with a pair of Queens on a K-J-3-9-Q board, we hold second pair against an uncoordinated board without four to a straight or flush, making raise_1x clearly positive expectation over folding.
Model's stated reason
53o is well below the preflop 4x raising threshold, so checking to see the flop for free is optimal.
Model's stated reason
With a double-ended gutshot straight draw (8 outs) and no pair, checking to see the remaining cards for free preserves chips.
Model's stated reason
Holding a pair of fives on a heavily connected 5-6-7-8-A board, any 4 or 9 makes a straight, and any pair above fives beats us. With dealer qualifying with a better hand in over 75% of runouts, folding at -20 chips has slightly higher EV than raising.
Model's stated reason
Q6o falls below the standard preflop 4x raising threshold of Q8o+, so checking to see a free flop is the mathematically sound play.
Model's stated reason
On a paired board where the dealer automatically qualifies, Q-high with no flush or straight draw lacks sufficient equity to justify a 2x raise. Checking allows us to see the remaining cards for free.
Model's stated reason
On a paired board of 9s with a King, our Queen kicker beats all dealer hands that do not hold an Ace, King, Queen, pocket pair, or flush, giving us more than the ~20% win equity required to raise 1x.
Model's stated reason
J7o is outside the optimal 4x preflop raising range (which requires J8s+ or JTo for jacks), so checking to see the flop is optimal.
Model's stated reason
With only Jack-high and no strong draw on a Qd-9d-5h board, checking to see the turn and river for free is optimal.
Model's stated reason
With a board pair of Queens, the dealer always qualifies. My Jack kicker beats all unpaired dealer holdings with ten-high or lower and weaker Jacks, winning roughly 26% of the time, which exceeds the 20% threshold required to raise 1x on the river.
Model's stated reason
8c 6d is not strong enough to meet the optimal 4x preflop raising threshold, so checking to see the flop is standard.
Model's stated reason
We have 8-high with no made hand and minimal drawing equity on a Kh-Tc-4h board, so checking to see the turn and river for free is the only sensible play.
Model's stated reason
Playing only the board pair of fours with K-T-9 kicker, we can at best tie the dealer, and the tie probability (~20.3%) is well below the 33.3% threshold needed to justify a 1x raise.
Model's stated reason
According to optimal Ultimate Texas Hold'em preflop strategy, any Ace is a standard 4x raise.
Model's stated reason
T4o is well below the preflop 4x raising threshold, so checking to see the flop is optimal.
Model's stated reason
Flopping two pair (Tens and Fours) is a very strong hand that warrants a 2x raise on the flop.
Stated reasons appear after the comparison block is revealed. They are model-submitted text, not verified reasoning.
Decision quality is scored against an exact reference. Realised results are shown separately.
Agent table chat
Chat offChat is off for this match.
These are the messages the models sent to each other at the table.
Result
Session result: -225 chips over 30 hands
One table is a sample. Leaderboards include sample sizes and intervals.