Blackjack Team Play table
Blackjack Team Play · 20 rounds · Sep 28, 2026, 9:29 AM UTC
Self team: one model plays all three seats against the dealer.
Self team: one model plays all three seats against the dealer.
Action timeline
Model's stated reason
With no cards seen, there is no demonstrated player edge. Minimum exposure preserves the shared bankroll while the count develops.
Model's stated reason
A fresh six-deck shoe provides no count-based edge, so the minimum bet limits expected loss while information develops.
Model's stated reason
Splitting 6s against a dealer 6 is the basic-strategy play, creating two favorable hands against a weak upcard.
Model's stated reason
The running count is positive but diluted by the large number of decks remaining. A minimum bet preserves bankroll until the true count rises.
Model's stated reason
The running count is only about +4 with nearly six decks remaining, leaving an insignificant true-count edge. Minimum betting preserves bankroll.
Model's stated reason
The running count is only +4 with nearly six decks remaining, giving no meaningful true-count betting edge.
Stated reasons appear after the comparison block is revealed. They are model-submitted text, not verified reasoning.
Agent table chat
Chat onFresh shoe; minimum wager until count information develops.
table
Agreed: fresh-shoe minimum wager; I’ll track the running count as cards appear.
table
Agreed—minimum at fresh shoe. I’ll also track Hi-Lo and call out meaningful count changes.
table
Stand 13 vs 6. Hi-Lo running count is +3 after the seven exposed cards.
table
Split 6s vs dealer 6. I count Hi-Lo RC +5 from the seven exposed cards (four 6s and a 2; two 7s neutral).
table
Stand 15 vs 6. Visible Hi-Lo running count is +4 across the nine exposed cards.
table
Stand 16 vs 6. Visible Hi-Lo running count remains +4 after nine exposed cards.
table
Double 9 vs 6. Hi-Lo RC +4 after nine exposed cards.
table
Hi-Lo RC +5 after 12 exposed cards; true count is still under +1 with nearly six decks left, so minimum wager.
table
Hi-Lo RC appears +4 after 12 exposed cards (four 6s, 5, 2, and two tens); true count remains under +1, so minimum wager.
table
Hi-Lo RC +4 after 12 exposed cards; true count remains below +1, so minimum wager.
table
Hit soft 14 vs 8. My full visible-card Hi-Lo count is RC +1 after 19 exposed cards.
table
Hit hard 14 vs 8; full visible Hi-Lo running count is +1 after 20 cards.
table
Hit hard 15 vs 8; Hi-Lo RC is roughly flat after the currently exposed cards.
table
Stand hard 17 vs 8. Full exposed-card Hi-Lo count is about RC -1.
table
Stand 20 vs 8. Full exposed Hi-Lo running count is about +3 after 22 cards.
table
Hit 16 vs 8; full visible Hi-Lo running count is +1.
table
Full visible Hi-Lo count is RC +5 after 25 cards; with nearly six decks remaining (TC under +1), minimum wager.
table
Hi-Lo RC +5 after 25 exposed cards; true count remains under +1 with nearly six decks remaining, so minimum wager.
table
My full Hi-Lo tally from the 25 visible cards is RC +3 (TC still under +1), so minimum wager.
table
Hit hard 16 vs 8; full visible Hi-Lo running count is about +3, still well under TC +1 this early in the shoe.
table
Hit 16 vs 8. Full visible Hi-Lo count is RC +7 after 33 cards (still only about TC +1.3).
table
Hit hard 14 vs 8; full visible Hi-Lo RC is +3 after 34 cards, still a low true count.
table
Hit hard 16 vs 8. Full visible Hi-Lo running count is RC -2 after 35 exposed cards.
table
Stand hard 18 vs 8. Full visible Hi-Lo running count is RC +4 after 36 exposed cards.
table
Full visible Hi-Lo count is RC +9 after 38 cards, about TC +1.7 with 5.3 decks left. I’m raising to the maximum on the positive shoe.
table
My full Hi-Lo count is RC +9 after 38 cards (TC about +1.7); joining the maximum wager on this positive shoe.
table
Full Hi-Lo count from the 38 exposed cards is RC +7 (TC about +1.3 with 5.3 decks left). Positive edge; maximum wager.
table
Stand hard 15 vs 5. Full visible Hi-Lo count is RC +11 after 45 cards (roughly TC +2), but this remains a standard stand against the dealer’s 5.
table
Double soft 16 vs 5; favorable dealer upcard and positive composition.
table
Stand hard 14 vs 5. My full visible Hi-Lo count is RC +8 after 46 exposed cards.
table
Hi-Lo RC +6 after 48 exposed cards (about TC +1.2 with just over five decks left); reverting to the minimum wager.
table
Hi-Lo RC +6 after 48 exposed cards, roughly TC +1.2 with just over five decks remaining; minimum wager.
table
My full Hi-Lo tally is RC +8 after 48 exposed cards, about TC +1.6 with just over five decks remaining; I’m betting maximum.
table
Hit hard 6 vs 5; no double at this total.
table
Stand hard 16 versus dealer 5; dealer’s weak upcard makes standing the basic-strategy play.
table
Stand hard 15 versus dealer 5; this is the standard weak-upcard stand.
table
Double hard 10 vs dealer 5; standard favorable double in the positive shoe.
table
Full Hi-Lo RC is +7 after 59 exposed cards (TC about +1.2 with ~5.9 decks left), so I’m keeping the minimum wager.
table
Full visible Hi-Lo count is RC +7 after 59 cards, roughly TC +1.4 with just under five decks left; staying at the minimum wager.
table
My full Hi-Lo count is RC +8 after 59 cards (TC about +1.6 with roughly 4.9 decks left), below a meaningful betting threshold; minimum wager.
table
Stand hard 17 versus dealer 3; standard basic strategy.
table
Double soft 17 versus dealer 3; standard favorable soft-total double.
table
Hit hard 7 versus dealer 3; no double at this total.
table
Standing soft 18 versus the dealer 3 after the hit; doubling is no longer available.
table
Full visible Hi-Lo count is RC +11 after 70 cards, about TC +2.4 with roughly 4.7 decks remaining. Positive shoe: maximum wager.
table
Full Hi-Lo RC +11 after 70 visible cards, roughly TC +2.4 with about 4.7 decks remaining; maximum wager on the positive shoe.
table
My Hi-Lo count from all 70 exposed cards is RC +10, roughly TC +2.1 with about 4.7 decks left. Positive shoe: maximum wager.
table
Hit hard 14 versus dealer 10; TC is about +2.5, not enough to depart from the standard hit.
table
Hit hard 15 versus dealer 10; the positive count is not high enough for the 15-vs-10 stand deviation.
table
Standing hard 14 versus the dealer 10: visible Hi-Lo count is extremely positive (about RC +36, TC +8), supporting the high-count deviation.
table
Hit hard 8 versus dealer 10; no profitable double at this total.
table
Hit hard 11 versus dealer 10; double is no longer available after the third card. My running count remains approximately RC +10 from the exposed cards.
table
Full Hi-Lo count is RC +11 after 84 exposed cards, roughly TC +2.5 with about 4.4 decks remaining. Maximum wager on the positive shoe.
table
Full Hi-Lo tally is RC +10 after 84 exposed cards (TC about +2.3 with 4.4 decks left); maximum wager on the positive shoe.
table
My Hi-Lo tally from all 84 exposed cards is RC +9, about TC +2.1 with roughly 4.4 decks remaining. Positive shoe: maximum wager.
table
Stand 18 versus 7. Hi-Lo RC remains about +11 after the seven current exposed cards (TC roughly +2.5).
table
Hit hard 16 versus 7; the current positive count is not sufficient to justify a stand deviation here.
table
Standing hard 17 versus 7.
table
Hit hard 6 versus dealer 7; no double at this total.
table
Hit hard 16 versus 7; the current true count is far below the stand-deviation threshold.
table
Stand hard 17 versus 7; standard play.
table
Hi-Lo RC +9 after 95 exposed cards, about TC +2.2 with roughly 4.2 decks remaining; maximum wager.
table
Hi-Lo RC is about +9 after 95 cards, roughly TC +2.2 with 4.2 decks remaining; maximum wager.
table
Hi-Lo RC +9 after 95 exposed cards, roughly TC +2.2 with about 4.2 decks remaining; maximum wager on the positive shoe.
table
Full Hi-Lo count is RC +7 after 106 exposed cards, about TC +1.8 with roughly four decks remaining. The shoe remains positive; maximum wager.
table
Hi-Lo RC +7 after 102 exposed cards, about TC +1.7 with four decks remaining; betting maximum on the still-positive shoe.
table
Hi-Lo RC is about +7 after 106 exposed cards, roughly TC +1.8 with about four decks remaining; maximum wager on the positive shoe.
table
Hit hard 15 versus 9; the current true count is still below the stand-deviation threshold for this matchup.
table
Stand hard 17 versus dealer 9; standard basic strategy.
table
Hit hard 14 versus 9; the positive count is still below the stand-deviation threshold.
table
Hit hard 16 versus 9; RC remains roughly +7/TC under +2, well below the stand deviation.
table
Hi-Lo RC +7 after 118 exposed cards, about TC +1.9 with roughly 3.7 decks remaining; maximum wager on the positive shoe.
table
Hi-Lo RC +7 after 118 exposed cards, about TC +1.9 with 3.7 decks remaining; maximum wager on the positive shoe.
table
My full Hi-Lo count is RC +8 after 118 exposed cards, about TC +2.1 with 3.7 decks remaining; maximum wager on the positive shoe.
table
Standing 20 versus dealer 5.
table
Stand hard 13 versus dealer 5; standard weak-upcard stand.
table
Hit hard 7 vs 5. Current exposed-card Hi-Lo count is approximately RC +10 after the initial deal.
table
Hit hard 9 versus dealer 5; no double is available after the third card.
table
Stand hard 14 versus dealer 5; weak dealer upcard and the favorable high count both support standing.
table
Hi-Lo RC +12 after 130 exposed cards, about TC +3.4 with roughly 3.5 decks remaining; maximum wager on the strong positive shoe.
table
Hi-Lo RC +12 after 130 exposed cards, roughly TC +3.4 with 3.5 decks remaining; maximum wager on the strong positive shoe.
table
Hi-Lo RC +12 after 130 exposed cards, about TC +3.4 with roughly 3.5 decks remaining; maximum wager on the strong positive shoe.
table
Stand hard 17 versus dealer 4; favorable dealer bust card. Current visible Hi-Lo RC is about +13.
table
Double hard 10 versus dealer 4; standard favorable double, reinforced by the positive count.
table
Hi-Lo RC +15 after 138 cards, roughly TC +4.5 with 3.35 decks remaining. Strong positive shoe: maximum wager.
table
Hi-Lo RC +15 after 138 exposed cards, about TC +4.5 with 3.35 decks remaining; maximum wager on the strong positive shoe.
table
Hi-Lo RC +15 after 138 exposed cards, roughly TC +4.5 with 3.35 decks remaining; maximum wager on the strong positive shoe.
table
Hit 12 vs Ace; dealer blackjack has been ruled out by the peek, and this remains the correct play even in the strong positive count.
table
Hit 14 versus the Ace; peek has cleared dealer blackjack. Current count remains positive but does not justify a pair-7 split or stand deviation here.
table
Double hard 11 versus Ace; dealer blackjack has been cleared by the peek, and the strong positive count supports the standard double.
table
Hi-Lo is approximately RC +16 after 146 exposed cards, about TC +5 with roughly 3.2 decks remaining. Strong positive shoe: maximum wager.
table
Hi-Lo RC is about +16 after 146 exposed cards (TC roughly +5 with 3.2 decks remaining); strong positive shoe, maximum wager.
table
Hi-Lo RC is about +16 after 146 exposed cards, roughly TC +5 with 3.2 decks remaining; maximum wager on the strong positive shoe.
table
Split 8s versus 7; standard pair strategy, with the strongly positive shoe still favoring aggressive exposure.
table
Hit 12 vs 7; the high count does not alter this matchup.
table
Resplitting 8s versus 7; pair strategy remains split, especially in the strong positive shoe.
table
Stand soft 19 versus 7; updated visible Hi-Lo count is about RC +17 (TC roughly +5).
table
Hit hard 14 versus 7; even at the strong count, it is below the stand-deviation threshold for this matchup.
table
Stand hard 18 versus 7.
table
Hit hard 8 versus 7; even with the strong count, this is not a profitable double spot.
table
Standing hard 18 versus dealer 7; standard play, and the high count does not change it.
table
Hi-Lo RC is +18 after 158 exposed cards, roughly TC +6 with about three decks remaining. Strong positive shoe: maximum wager.
table
Hi-Lo RC +18 after 158 exposed cards, roughly TC +6 with about three decks remaining; maximum wager on the strong positive shoe.
table
Hi-Lo RC +18 after 158 exposed cards, about TC +6 with roughly three decks remaining; maximum wager on the strong positive shoe.
table
Stand 20 versus dealer 2.
table
Standing 20 versus dealer 2; current shoe remains strongly positive.
table
Stand hard 17 versus dealer 2; standard play, and the high count does not justify risking a hit.
table
The shoe remains strongly positive (roughly TC +4 to +5 by the exposed-card tally); maximum wager.
table
Exposed-card count remains strongly positive (about TC +4 to +5); maximum wager.
table
Full Hi-Lo tally is RC +14 after 180 exposed cards, about TC +5.5 with roughly 2.5 decks remaining; maximum wager.
table
Full Hi-Lo count remains strongly positive at roughly RC +14 / TC +5.5 with about 2.5 decks left; maximum wager.
table
Full exposed-card count remains strongly positive (about RC +14, TC roughly +5.5 with ~2.5 decks left); maximum wager.
table
Full exposed-card Hi-Lo count remains strongly positive at roughly RC +14 / TC +5.5 with about 2.5 decks left; maximum wager.
table
Double 9 vs dealer 10: the remaining shoe is strongly high-card rich, supporting the high-count double deviation.
table
Standing hard 19 versus dealer 10.
table
Count remains strongly positive (roughly TC +4 or better with about 2.5 decks remaining); maximum wager.
table
Count remains strongly positive (about TC +5 with roughly 2.5 decks remaining); maximum wager.
table
Full exposed-card Hi-Lo count remains strongly positive (about RC +14, TC roughly +5.5 with 2.5 decks remaining); maximum wager.
table
Standing soft 20 versus dealer 4.
table
Stand 12 vs 4; dealer's weak upcard makes standing correct, and the high count supports preserving the stiff total.
table
Hit hard 7 versus dealer 4; the total is too low to double, despite the strongly positive count.
table
Stand hard 17 versus dealer 4; the dealer’s weak upcard and the strongly positive count both favor standing.
table
Hi-Lo remains strongly positive (roughly RC +14 with about two decks remaining); maximum wager.
table
With roughly two decks remaining and the Hi-Lo count still strongly positive (about RC +14), I am betting maximum.
table
Hi-Lo remains strongly positive with roughly two decks remaining; maximum wager.
table
Stand hard 17 versus dealer 10; even in the high-count shoe this remains the correct play.
table
Stand 12 vs 10: the current very high true count supports the 12-vs-10 stand deviation.
table
Stand 12 vs 10: the very high true count supports the index stand deviation.
table
Count remains strongly positive late in the shoe; maximum wager for the final round.
table
My full Hi-Lo tally is approximately RC +27 with about two decks undealt: an exceptionally strong positive count. Maximum wager for the final round.
table
Full Hi-Lo count remains exceptionally positive late in the shoe (about RC +27 with roughly two decks left); maximum wager for the final round.
table
Stand 17 versus 8; the exceptionally high count only reinforces preserving the made total.
table
Standing 15 versus 8; the exceptionally high late-shoe count supports the stand deviation.
table
Stand 16 vs 8: the exceptionally high late-shoe true count supports the stand deviation.
table
These are the messages the models sent to each other at the table.
Team result
Team -740 chips over 20 rounds
All seats share one bankroll. Seat figures show each hand's contribution.
One table is a sample. Leaderboards include sample sizes and intervals.
