Craps table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge (1.36%) among available bets. I'll take the flat bet now and add laid odds if a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 10; my don't pass flat bet is a 2:1 favorite, and max laid odds cost nothing in EV while boosting odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing don't pass and laid odds on 10, which are in a favorable position. No new bets because every available bet has a negative expected value and no additional odds can be added.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting don't pass with a small flat stake to allow maximum odds later, minimizing house edge and maximizing odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add maximum laid odds behind my don't pass bet on the 6; odds carry zero house edge and improve odds utilization without adding negative-EV exposure.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

The existing don't pass flat bet has positive conditional expectation on point 6 (7 is more likely than 6), and the laid odds are fairly priced. No other legal bet offers positive EV, so holding is optimal.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No new bet offers positive expected value; existing dont_pass and odds on 6 are kept since additional odds are not available and removing would forfeit the current positive conditional position.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bet don't pass with 75 to enable maximum odds later, minimizing house edge per chip.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Adding maximum laid odds behind my don't pass bet on the 4; odds are zero house edge and improve odds utilization. Keeping the existing don't pass bet since it has positive conditional EV on point 4.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No positive-EV bets are available; the existing dont_pass and laid odds on 4 are favorable/fair, so I keep them and add nothing.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add a small dont_come flat bet to enable zero-EV odds next roll, improving odds utilization while keeping expected loss low.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add maximum laid odds behind the existing don't come 6 to improve odds utilization at zero house edge; keep the positive-EV don't pass and don't come flats.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting the minimum on the Don't Pass line establishes a flat bet to enable max odds later, minimizing expected loss while positioning for zero-EV odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No positive-EV bets are available; the existing don't pass on point 6 has positive expectation, so I keep it and add nothing.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keeping the existing don't pass bet, which has positive expected value on point 6. No new bets are placed because all available bets have negative expected value and no odds are permitted.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing dont_pass bet on point 6, which now has positive expected value; avoid adding any new negative-EV bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge among available flat bets, and I'll add laid odds if a point is established to maximize odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting the minimum on Don't Pass (lowest house edge flat bet) to enable maximum proportional odds later, minimizing expected loss per chip and maximizing odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available new bets carry a negative house edge, while my existing dont_pass on point 8 is a favorable position. I add nothing and keep the current bet.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No positive expected value bets are available; keeping the existing dont_pass bet which has positive conditional EV on point 8.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge (1.36%) and allows laid odds later. Stake 50 ensures we can max out odds within the 300 exposure limit for any point.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Adding maximum laid odds behind my don't pass bet on 9 has zero house edge, improving odds utilization and lowering expected loss per chip without adding any negative-EV exposure.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Pass line has the lowest house edge among available come-out bets and sets up free odds later for odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Adding full pass-line odds behind the existing point of 10 is the only zero-house-edge bet available and uses the remaining exposure without increasing expected loss per chip.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Placing a don't come bet leverages its slightly lower house edge and sets up for adding laid odds next roll, improving odds utilization while staying within exposure limits.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Adding laid odds to the existing don't come 9 bet is a zero-house-edge wager that improves odds utilization and dilutes expected loss per chip without increasing risk beyond the exposure limit.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge on the come-out. Staking 6 allows maximum laid odds on all possible points (6 is the smallest multiple satisfying the odds stake requirements for 6/8, 5/9, and 4/10).

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Taking full laid odds on the don't pass point of 5, which is a zero-EV bet that improves odds utilization without adding house edge.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Existing dont pass and max odds on point 5 are already optimal; all other available bets carry a house edge, so no new bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing don't pass and laid odds on point 5; the flat bet is favorable at this point and the odds are fair, while all newly available bets carry a house edge. No new action avoids adding negative EV.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bet minimum on Don't Pass to minimize expected loss; if a point is established, I will add maximum laid odds to improve odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting the minimum flat that allows maximum 5x odds within the 300 exposure cap, minimizing house edge per chip and maximizing odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Maximize zero-house-edge odds behind my existing don't pass bet; point 9 gives a 60% win chance and laid odds pay true 2:3.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 9 with a 50 don't pass and 99 laid odds already working; adding any new bet would only increase expected loss, and the existing don't pass position is already the best available edge. No change.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Point is 9 with my don't pass and laid odds already working; no new bet has positive expectation, so I stand pat and let the existing bets resolve.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting don't pass has the lowest house edge (1.36%) and allows laying odds if a point is established, which maximizes odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Bet the minimum on Don't Pass to minimize house edge and preserve the ability to take maximum odds if a point is established, optimizing EV loss per chip and odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Placing a large dont_come bet to maximize odds utilization next roll, as odds dilute the house edge and keep ev_loss_per_chip low. The existing dont_pass is left working since it has positive expected value once the point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting the minimum on don't pass to minimize expected loss while allowing for odds utilization if a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add maximum laid odds behind the existing don't pass bet; odds carry zero house edge and improve odds utilization without adding negative-EV exposure.