Craps table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No bet has zero expected loss; every available wager has a negative expected value.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Every available wager has negative expected value, and no pass-line or odds bet is currently legal. With no positive-EV opportunity, preserving chips is best.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Every available bet has negative expected value, and no odds bet is currently available to reduce the edge. Since the objective is to maximize my chips, I’ll preserve my bankroll rather than wager.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available wagers have negative expected value, and no odds bets are currently available. I’m preserving my bankroll rather than adding a house-edge bet.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Every available wager has negative expected value, and no pass-line or odds bets are legal here. To maximize expected chips, I’m sitting this roll out.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No wager has positive expected value; the available bets all carry a house edge, so passing preserves chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available wagers have negative expected value, so the best way to maximize expected chips is not to bet. Prior rolls do not change the odds of this roll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Every available bet has negative expected value, and there is no requirement to wager. Passing preserves my bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I’m sitting this roll out: every available wager has negative expected value, while making no bet preserves my bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has positive expected value; passing preserves the bankroll and avoids the house edge.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I’m placing no bet: every available wager has negative expected value, and the prior rolls do not change the odds of the next roll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have negative expected value, and odds are not currently available. Sitting out preserves bankroll rather than taking a house-edge wager.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have negative expected value, and no free-odds bet is available here. Passing preserves my bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I’m not placing a bet: every available wager has negative expected value, while keeping my chips preserves their full value.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No bet has positive expected value; passing preserves my chips rather than accepting a house edge.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No bet has positive expected value; keeping the bankroll unexposed maximizes expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available wagers have negative expected value, while placing no bet preserves the bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has positive expected value; sitting out avoids expected losses.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I’m sitting this roll out; every available wager has negative expected value, so abstaining best preserves my chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I’ll keep my chips rather than make a wager with a positive house edge; no pass-line or odds bets are available in this action.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

A 1-chip don't-pass bet has a slightly lower house edge than pass line and keeps exposure minimal.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I’ll keep the existing don’t-pass bet: with the point on 6, it has favorable odds from here. The available new bets have a house edge, so I’m not adding one.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Take down the removable don't-pass bet to avoid its remaining negative expected value; the recent rolls do not change the dice odds.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I’m sitting out because every available wager has negative expected value. The recent rolls and current point do not change the fair dice odds.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No bet has zero expected loss; every available wager has a house edge, so preserving the bankroll best maximizes expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All currently available bets have negative expected value, and pass-line odds are not available in this action. I preserve my bankroll by sitting out.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has positive expected value, and no odds are available to reduce a flat bet’s house edge. Passing preserves chips and minimizes expected loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available wager has positive expected value, and no true-odds bets are currently legal. Passing preserves the bankroll and maximizes expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All currently legal wagers have negative expected value, so placing no bet best preserves chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has positive expected value, so keeping my chips off the table minimizes expected loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has positive expected value, so preserving the bankroll is optimal.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No available bet has positive expected value; standing pat avoids the house edge and preserves chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

With no positive-expectation bets available, sitting out preserves chips and maximizes expected bankroll.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have a house edge, so placing no wager minimizes expected chip loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have negative expected value. With only six decision rolls remaining, preserving chips is preferable to taking on avoidable house edge.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No wager has positive expected value; declining to bet preserves my bankroll and maximizes expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I’m not placing a bet: every available wager has negative expected value, and the remaining rolls do not improve those odds.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have negative expected value, and the recent rolls do not change their odds. With only three decision rolls remaining, preserving chips is preferable to taking a house-edge bet.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No wager has positive expected value; with only two decision rolls remaining, preserving the bankroll is best.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

With only one decision roll remaining and no zero-edge wagers available, placing a bet adds expected loss. I’ll keep my chips off the table.