Craps table

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting the don't pass with a 6-chip flat to enable maximum free odds later, minimizing house edge and maximizing odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

My don't pass bet has a point of 6, so laying full 5x odds (30) at 5:6 has zero house edge and maximizes odds utilization. The 6 is the most likely point to repeat, but laid odds are still EV-neutral and improve the score's odds_utilization metric.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge among available come-out bets (1.36%). I'm staking the minimum to keep expected loss low while allowing maximum odds later.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Establish a minimal pass-line flat now so I can later take maximum free odds once a point is set; odds carry zero house edge, which lowers EV loss per chip and maximizes odds utilization. One-roll propositions and place/hardway bets have far higher edges, so I avoid them.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add full 3x odds behind my pass line point of 4; odds carry zero house edge and improve odds utilization without adding expected loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No new bet offers zero or positive expected value; my pass odds are already at the maximum, so adding any other wager would only increase expected loss per chip.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting don't pass to minimize house edge and position for free odds when a point is established.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Adding maximum laid odds to the existing don't pass bet to minimize house edge and maximize odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Holding the don't pass with max odds on point 4; no positive EV bets available, so no new action.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Holding existing dont_pass with max 3x odds on point 4. No new bets because all available bets have a positive house edge, which would increase ev_loss_per_chip.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Already have a dont_pass bet with max odds on point 4, which is a favorable situation. Adding any new bet would introduce negative expected value, so I hold.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting don't pass with 48 chips to minimize house edge and allow maximum laid odds when a point is established, optimizing ev_loss_per_chip and odds_utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Adding maximum laid odds behind my don't pass bet on the 9; it is a zero-house-edge bet that improves odds utilization without adding expected loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting the minimum on don't pass, the lowest house edge flat bet, to enable free laid odds later and minimize expected loss per chip.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No new bets: all available wagers here carry a negative house edge, and my existing dont_pass on point 6 is already a plus-EV position. I will keep it working and avoid adding any negative-EV exposure.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No positive expected value bets are available this roll; the existing don't pass bet on point 6 is favorable, so I keep it and add nothing.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No odds bets are offered this roll, so every available new bet has negative expected value. I make no additional wager and keep the existing don't pass bet, which is already in a favorable point-phase position.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting minimum on Don't Pass gives the lowest house edge (1.36%) and allows maximum odds multiple later, minimizing ev_loss_per_chip and maximizing odds_utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add maximum laid odds behind my don't pass bet on the 5; odds carry zero house edge and improve odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting don't pass with a 50 stake minimizes house edge and allows maximum odds behind it within the 300 exposure cap, optimizing odds utilization and EV loss per chip.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Adding maximum laid odds behind the don't pass point of 6. Odds bets are fair (zero house edge), so they increase odds utilization without adding expected loss. No other available bets offer positive expected value, so I avoid them.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing don't pass and laid odds on point 6; the flat bet has positive conditional EV with 7 more likely than 6, and the odds are zero-EV but already placed. No new bets because all available wagers carry a house edge and additional odds are not allowed.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing don't pass and laid odds on point 6: the flat bet has positive conditional expectation and the odds are zero EV. All newly available bets carry a negative house edge, so adding any would reduce expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting the lowest-house-edge flat bet (don't pass) at a stake that allows maximum 100-chip odds on any point, minimizing expected loss per chip while enabling high odds utilization later.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add maximum laid odds behind the existing don't pass point of 6; odds carry zero house edge, improving odds utilization and lowering expected loss per chip without changing the flat bet's favorable conditional position.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing don't pass flat bet (positive EV on point 6) and its fair laid odds; no new bets because every available bet has negative expected value.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No bet on this come-out roll: all available wagers carry a negative house edge, and no free odds are available without a point. Preserving bankroll maximizes expected chips.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Betting don't come because it has the lowest house edge (1.36%) among available bets. Using small stakes of 20 to allow maximum odds utilization next roll, minimizing expected loss per chip.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Adding maximum laid odds behind my don't come 8 is a zero-house-edge bet that improves odds utilization without increasing expected loss.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Place a new dont_come flat bet to establish a point and later add max odds, lowering the average house edge per chip. Keep the existing dont_come_8 and its odds, which are already in a positive-EV state.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Adding maximum laid odds on the existing don't come 6 to increase odds utilization with zero house edge. Keeping existing bets as they have positive conditional expectation.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No positive-EV bets are available; existing don't-come bets with points are favorable and odds are zero-EV. Adding any new bet would only increase expected loss, so I stand pat.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

All available bets have a negative house edge; the existing dont_come 8 with odds is favorable and should be kept. No new bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Placing multiple dont_come bets to establish points for odds, minimizing house edge and maximizing odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Don't pass has the lowest house edge among available come-out bets, and a 50 flat leaves room to take full odds if a point is established, improving odds utilization.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Add full laid odds behind my existing dont pass on the 10; it is zero-EV, improves odds utilization, and preserves my favorable position without adding negative-EV bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

Keep the existing don't pass flat bet (positive EV on point 10) and its fair odds; adding any new bet would only increase expected loss per chip, and no removal improves the current position.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

No positive expected value bets are available; with only two rolls remaining and no existing flat bet to attach zero-EV odds, the optimal chip-maximizing action is to place no bets.

I chose a legal action for this decision.

With one decision roll left and no odds bets available, every legal wager carries a negative expected value. Preserving the bankroll is the chip-maximizing action.